Does the FDA's Wheel of Salmonella Mean Food Irradiation on Your Dinner Table?

Headline: Counterthink on the FDA's Wheel of Salmonella "...making Americans scared of their vegetables is a great way to advance the FDA's food irradiation agenda..."

Mike Adams rocks the health world once again with his pointed commentary on the FDA fear campaign against vegetation. (I hope he does the same with HIV, AIDS & Gallo's Egg.) Regarding FDA vs. the vegetables, we are in agreement that the end result (if the germ-fearing bad guys win), would be the widespread use of ionizing radiation on all produce and other foodstuffs to "prevent" bacterial contamination.

Of course, FDA bureaucrats and their welfare scientist accomplices never ask the question:

"How did the bacteria get there in the first place?"

If that question were ever asked it might point to some ugly agricultural practices, whether they be for the "growth" of fruits and vegetables or the slaughter of animals. Our government (and New World Order aficionados) cannot stomach acknowledging Antoine Béchamp and The Law of the Terrain, for it would put an end to their Big Agribusiness gravy train. Why should we allow them to nuke much of the world's food supply?

Here's a news flash for you: Salmonella does not grow on tomatoes or peppers, nor the soil they are grown in -- unless that soil is contaminated. But from where or what? If you worked at FDA and you asked that question, say hello to a desk job where you'll likely become a fungus growing in a dark corner.

Is salmonella "poofed" into existence like Bernanke's Federal Reserve Notes? Soil contamination does not have magical causes. What if a Mexican farm were utilizing water composed of sewage runoff? The impression foisted upon us by big government accomplices in Big Media is that radiating crops is our only salvation. Stop the sewage sludge? Too hard. Just nuke it. Do you really think that your food should glow before you eat it?

How difficult is it to understand that toxic soil cannot sustain healthy plant life? Evidently, the degree of difficulty in understanding is beyond beyond the 4th grade education and behavioral level exhibited by the current bureaucratic oligarchy. Pathogenic bacteria grow in soil that has been sickened by either a lack of minerals or a preponderance of toxic chemicals or sewage sludge. What do the imbeciles at FDA propose as a solution? That which our government has been lobbied to promote. Just imagine if the untenable waste of one industry could be sold to (or mandated by) government for use as the final solution for some other industry or agenda. In this case, we get the "Nuke the Food" campaign. Sure, you can kill a few microbes, but is it worth it when you also destroy much of the remaining nutritional content? Perhaps those who are in the business of selling nuclear waste might say yes.

If that is too radical for you to consider, just look at fluoride. How did a neurotoxic waste product of the mining industry end up in our water and toothpaste? What's born every minute? Does anyone even remember P.T. Barnum?

What good is a malnourished and diseased population to government? It is the historical pattern of government to grow like a cancer until it destroys itself and everyone invested in it. The Founding Fathers and Framers of the Constitution knew it well. That is why they created a government with LIMITED powers. It would always be up to the people to bind the dangerous beast down with the chains of the Constitution.

But how could government grow and bestow largesse on a privileged class of monopolists? One sure-fire way was to make sure that the people fall asleep on the job of eternal vigilance. But how? Rob the food of its nutritional integrity and replace it with synthetic substitutes. In modern America, this means FDA approved medications plus chemically grown and processed foodstuffs. The FDA does not usually approve things with such a high degree of efficacy. This assault on health freedom via mandated food degradation has worked wonders for the growth of government.

It should be apparent to both "liberals" and "conservatives" by now that it matters not who is in power; in both cases, the bureaucratic behemoth gets bigger. If you think that you can control the behemoth for "good" purposes just because your ideology differs from whomever happens to be in power currently, then you suffer from delusions of grandeur. The other explanation might be a childlike naiveté. Both are dangerous to a constitutional republic founded on principles of individual liberty.

Have you read The Revolution: A Manifesto yet? Why is it that a humble doctor from Texas is the only one pointing out this real danger from within? Why was the Constitution even written if the other 434 members of Congress can ignore it when they disagree with it? We have a bunch of vegetables in office. Maybe they are the real source of the vegetation-infested salmonella?

Would it not seem logical to encourage farmers to replenish the soils in which their crops grow instead of nuking the end result? Let's be clear: The FDA will never seek the true cause of microbial infestation because then it would not be needed. Does John McCain have a monopoly on the "straight talk" express? Government and its bureaucracies need constant crises in order to grow. Now that they know how to create crises in perpetuity, media PR agencies must convince us that Big "G" also has a monopoly on the solutions for those crises. Truth is, no amount of antibiotics or nuclear sizzle can save us from this Hegelian Dialectic disaster. Got ionizing food radiation?

Restore integrity to the soil now; stop voting for Democrats and Republicans. If you can't do that, then don't complain when the FDA bans food in favor of sterile pills from GSK, Pfizer and Merck with all the synthetic nutrients to keep you enslaved to government. Never mind that the Flintstone's brand of SSRI's are not really vitamins.

I can almost hear Aldous Huxley saying "I told you so."

Rightful Discrimination: Why DNA Databasing by Government is Wrong

Headline: House sends anti-genetic discrimination bill to Bush "Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, was the only member of Congress to vote against the bill." Well, at least we know that it's unconstitutional...

Is there supposed to be a Federal role in genetic testing or databasing? I'm with Ron Paul. I know of NOWHERE in our nation's founding documents that it is found to be a proper and lawful role for the government to catalog us like animals.

There are obviously linguistic literary professionals hired to write, name and market these bills so they sound benign and helpful to us all. I mean, who would be "against" discrimination? Government-worshipers would like you to believe that this new legislation is necessary to protect you from insurance companies ready to turn your family down if they don't like your children's DNA sequence.

Actually, the thrust of this bill has nothing to do with genetic discrimination, but everything to do with removing another psychological barrier so that more Americans are willing to undergo the unnecessary and invasive testing. Are you the least bit reticent to turn over your DNA to an unelected bureaucratic oligarchy? They hope that you will be less so -- as long as you still believe that you will be eligible for medical insurance. Whether you can afford it or not is another question, because for certain, the government can't without stealing it from you or your neighbor first. Of course, they can always print the money until no one can afford anything without a wheel barrow full.

Genetic testing will start as being "voluntary." But, just like the Mothers Act, it will devolve into another federal mandate and soon you will not be able to fly without your genetic code embedded into your national I.D. Card. They will not stop until it's required, but don't worry because it's "for your own good."

But don't you want to know if you have "cancer" genes? Of course, they will never tell you that it's not your genes, it's their expression -- or much less that their expression depends upon what you believe and do. In other words, we all have genetic predispositions (or miasms) for disease, but genes change based upon our environment. Of course, that would mean that you are no longer a victim of your genes.

Not good for government or drug companies, but good for you.

Back to this genetic discrimination thing again. If you were an insurance company "writer" with responsibility to mitigate risk for the shareholders, and you found that someone had the gene for Sickle Cell Disease, would you insure them? You would be crazy to write them a policy. Of course, if a private company is free to determine who it insures, it will likely find a way to spread the negative potential and perhaps even write high risk policies. However, no insurance company would remain solvent if it could not discriminate for whom it issues a policy, however cruel.

Rather than being a boon to the uninsured, this genetic non-discrimination bill amounts to another government-mandated price increase for medical insurance across the board (for everyone). Inevitability, the illusion of "private" insurance will reveal itself to be an untenable web of regulations that ends whatever is left of the private insurance industry. Who will be able to afford it then?

Guess what. That's the plan. Hillary-care may be later than she thought, but she'll get it even if it's incremental and she's not the president. What's the end result? The feds complete their takeover of the medical insurance industry lock, stock and pill bottle.

Welcome to your universal single payer "insurance" disaster brought to you by Democrats AND Republicans. By government's intervention, there will be too few freedom lovers left who can actually afford insurance of any kind. Therefore, millions more will clamor for a medically-based Katrina style rescue. Clinton, Obama and McCain will happily oblige your medical enslavement.

It's both funny and tragic how BIG media and BIG government never acknowledge the fact that millions of the "tragically" uninsured are that way by choice. The "awakened" ones want little or nothing to do with government mandated medicine, much less the insurance that is there to pay for the bureaucrats interfering with the doctor-patient relationship.

Even if you are a fan of allopathic medicine, you do realize that government can NEVER deliver it to you in an efficient, fair and equitable manner, don't you? Here is where the economics of scale overwhelm even common sense. We do not have a crisis of health care because of a LACK of government bureaucracy. It has been many decades since there was a true free market in medicine and the healing arts.

We sit at the precipice of a diseased "universal" disaster simply because we have lost faith that freedom actually works better than central management and planning for three hundred million people. Genetic discrimination my as-pirin.

You are much more than your genetic code. No government will never get it (unless you turn it over to them). I just hope that we recognize our place in Creation before turning over what's left of our freedom to Aldous Huxley's and George Orwell's prophetic vision.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

Why did Ron Paul vote against the "Genetic Anti-Discrimination" bill? Does Dr. Paul know something that the rest of Congress do not? Read The Revolution: A Manifesto and you will know the answer to that question and more. In the mean time, change you belief, change your genes.

The Broken Bank of Fiat Money -- How Clad Can it Get?

Headline: Federal regulators close Arkansas bank ANB Financial "... banks closed by federal regulators over 'unsafe and unsound' practices..." What is unsafe and unsound about fractional reserve banking? Everything.

First, when the bank loans you Federal Reserve Notes, they have nothing at risk, while you are forced to sign your life away. For what? Evidence of debt.

Second, it wasn't for no reason that our Constitution clearly conveys that...

"no state shall make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts..."

Is your bank on the brink of failure? How about the "money" that you use? There can be no legitimate argument in support of forcing a free people to conduct commerce with perpetually devalued paper currency. Unless you divorce yourself from any semblance of morality and ethics. If you "help" the poor by stealing from your neighbor, how is that a noble act? If you force people to work harder each year for a dollar that is worth less, how can you claim to be "for the poor and middle class"?

Economic slavery is slavery just as sure as selling human beings into bondage is, whether it be early Egypt, the British Empire, or early America. You know what this means? The modern-day Democratic Party is pro-slavery. The modern-day Republican Party is pro-slavery, except for the few that have called for the abolition of the Federal Reserve and the income tax.

"It was the third closure this year of an FDIC-insured bank..."

How many people fail to understand the nature of money and the difference between fiat and specie? How many bank failures are too many?

There are many texts that exist to fill in the historical gaps left from government school indoctrination, including those recommended by Ron Paul in his new book, The Revolution: A Manifesto. Another great starter text is "Whatever Happened to Penny Candy?" by Richard Maybury.

Please do not allow another generation to grow up economically illiterate, absent an understanding of the link between inflation, immorality and slavery. In order for your kids to understand it, perhaps you should get a good grasp on it as well.

Maybe it's time for some grad school courses at The Ludwig von Mises Institute. Actually, all grade levels are welcome. It's a great excuse to study with your kids. Summer school anyone?

Neoconservative Chaos Over the Ron Paul Revolution

Headline: Chaos over Paul cuts short gathering "After a super-majority of Ron Paul supporters captured control of the Republican state convention Saturday, state party officials abruptly canceled the event..." What is the Republican Party's definition of chaos? Perhaps a candidate which supports constitutionally limited government getting more delegates than one who supports Big Government.

Segments of the party of "smaller" government are now in a panic because an "old" Republican is pointing out the constitutional deficiency disease plaguing the neo-conservative dilweeds currently in charge of the asylum. Don't worry, Democrats do not behave much better as their party leaders confuse our constitution with the Communist Manifesto, rather than a document designed to restrict government from trampling upon the freedom of the people.

In my opinion, they would all do much better if they read and understood The Revolution: A Manifesto by Dr. Ron Paul -- preferably before this nation is irreparably harmed by those who believe that government is the best solution for anything that ails us.

The Republican Party leadership is acting like a bunch of crybabies over the Ron Paul phenomenon. Normally, a party with declining membership and participation would embrace a new influx of enthusiasm and energy, especially one so diverse and vocal. That it does not is clearly an indication that the GOP has lost its way.

"[Ron Paul's] contingent came to the state convention prepared for battle. They had a row of printers to print ballots for their supporters to the national convention. They set up a communications network using text messages to cell phones to make sure everyone voted correctly on motions that would benefit their effort. And they scoured the rules for opportunities to level the playing field."

This sounds to me like a group of people on a mission. If you do not like the rules stacked against you, find the loophole and change the rules. Have you read about The Four Hour Workweek yet? Ron Paul Republicans are showing perseverance and creativity, something lacking among the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party.

It may be true that sometimes a generation has to die out before a full shift in consciousness can take place. The old guard is a bit frustrated that the Ron Paul Republicans don't seem to waiting for neoconservative demise. Freedom shall wait for no man. It must be realized.

What's the "manifesto" for this newer political generation?

Got Ron Paul?

RSBell Radio Show May 4, 2008, 1 PM - 4 PM EDT

Radio broadcast on Sunday, May 4, 2008 from 1 PM to 4 PM EDT: While it is true that a revolution represents one earthly trip around the sun, what it does not account for is the experience gained along the way... The original American revolution was way ahead of its time as evidenced by our lack of appreciation for the sacrifices made by our revolutionary ancestors. A lot has happened in the last 234 years, much of which should leave us grateful for their wisdom and courage. The architects of our nation (grounded in the protection of individual liberty) knew that they had tapped into timeless principles. Yet, time has a way of eroding our recognition and appreciation of that which has immeasurable value. What are these truths that we once held to be self evident? Only one man running for president is doing his level best to remind us with The Revolution: A Manifesto. Who gains by marginalizing the message of freedom being shouted from the rooftops by none other than Dr. Ron Paul? If there is to be a new American Revolution, or at least a return to the old one, it will be done from a new state of consciousness -- one that was earned by our foolish willingness to relinquish it in the first place. Freedom is not for the lazy, but it is the true state which we were born to inherit. Even if we are able to restore it to our posterity, it will be up to them to keep it, just as Ben Franklin warned us so many years ago.

The Robert Scott Bell Show cherishes the principles that strengthen our understanding and practical application of freedom and healing. Where other talk shows leave off, the Robert Scott Bell Show is just getting started. Listen to the voice of health freedom and liberty for perspective this week Sunday, May 4, 2008 from 1 PM to 4 PM EDT. Just turn on your radio or internet stream at the appropriate time.

Hour One: Attack of the Medical Board -- Are you fed up with state medical boards limiting your choices and access to alternative/natural medicine? Who grants authority to unelected medical bureaucrats to decide what you can and cannot do in the care of your body? If you realized just how much your healing choices are limited by that which claims to "protect" you in government, you would likely riot. A big part of the disease care crisis is due to the government monopoly granted to allopathic medicine in the health care arena. The big secret is that a few cowardly doctors block the gateway to medical freedom and innovation and attack doctors like my good friend, Dr. Rashid Buttar. Here's is what to do about it (listen on radio). Don't worry, if you miss it, you can still catch the podcast. What else is in the news? Hey, this is the news! Please remember to support HR 2117 - The Health Freedom Protection Act and defang the FDA (and the rest of the bureaucratic oligarchy) once and for all with the Congressional Responsibility and Accountability Act: H.R. 3302. Thanks for listening in where there's more freedom in three hours than most shows have in a whole year! Your calls at 1-800-449-8255. (Show topics subject to change based on breaking news and the whims of the host.)

Hour Two: Raw Milk Renegades -- Sweet little Mennonites selling milk are now considered to be enemy combatants to the state of Pennsylvania. How long will it be before the Department of Homeland Security sends the Amish to Guantanamo Bay? What act could be so terrifying as to warrant this great alarm among local, state and federal authorities? Well, the milk being sold happened to be raw! Oh, and did I mention that he lacked a permit? If we have declined as nation to the point that we must imprison farmers that dare sell milk without government permission, I am afraid that we have completely detached from the reason that these united States of America were founded. Also, for the sake of economic healing and freedom, more on the Free Competition in Currency Act. Plus, once you realize that we all suffer from a constitutional-deficiency disease, you may decide to look further into the good doctor Ron Paul. (Show topics subject to change based on breaking news and the whims of the host.)

Hour Three: Health Revolution -- Where do we stand on this freedom thing? Do we trust that liberty is the terrain for vitality or do we believe that government interference is the only path to good health? The Democrats do not have a candidate who believes in health freedom. The Republicans do, but they are apparently so frightened of him that they would rather go home early than face the possibility that he may get more delegates than the anointed one. Also, who needs a blood transfusion? Nobody, if they actually paid attention to the work of French Physiologist and Biologist Réné Quinton. What other ways are available to you should you need to build the blood? How about for rebuilding this nation on a platform of the Constitution? Call me at 1-800-449-8255. Empowering the nation and everyone in it to heal, only on the united States of health talk radio. (Show topics subject to change based on breaking news and the whims of the host.)

Bonus Natural Solution Links for Independence:

Energize your heart with Corvalen^®! Call 1-866-267-8253 and mention The Robert Scott Bell Show and get 20% off your first order! It's great for Fibromyalgia too!

See you at The Health Freedom Expo in Chicago, Ilinois, June 27-29, 2008!