Monday, December 21, 2009
"Vaccine Attacks on Children" podcast link
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Hide Your Sons, Merck has them in the Crosshairs with Bullets of Gardasil
Headline: Oral Cancer in Men Associated With HPV “The high risk of HPV-associated cancers in men suggests that vaccinating all adolescents is something that should strongly be considered,” said the lead researcher, Dr. Francis P. Worden...
I already warned you to hide your daughters. Now you must hide your sons as well. Last week it was women up to the age of 45, now they are going after young boys. Does the pharmaceutical industrial complex have any sense of decency?
This full-frontal assault on HPV is senseless, especially considering that there are so many natural ways to support immune function, much less eradicate a virus that anyone with minimal semblance of terrain integrity could clear with no pharmaceutical help at all.
The game is marketing and their weapon is your fear of the microbe. As long as you remain ignorant of the true laws of nature, it is a mere matter of Madison Street mathematics to keep you a customer of drugs and vaccines for questionable causation.
HPV does not cause cervical cancer. The lack of optimal immune function does. Have you looked into Uniform Picoscalar Oligodynamic Silver Hydrosol yet?
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Natural Solutions to Drug Resistance Futility
TB Drug Treatment Can Lead to Severe Pneumonia "Our data suggest that the use of fluoroquinones to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in children has led to the emergence of invasive pneumococcal diseases caused by levofloxacin-non-susceptible S. pneumoniae and its nosocomial spread among children," the researchers concluded. More evidence that modern pharmaceutical pseudoscience, for every disease it pretends to eradicate, creates at least ten new ones to take their place. Infectious disease was once the category upon which allopathic medicine hung its hat. That was at the advent of the sulfa drugs and then more complex antibiotics. At the time, very few physicians understood the long term degradation of the human immune system that would occur from over-reliance on and abuse of the new wonder drugs for acute infection. In the time span of a few short decades, microbial resistance would rear its ugly head, ultimately reaching the point at which the entire allopathic industry would acknowledge its very real danger. TB is an end-stage infection within a chronically ill person. Chronicity is created by nutritional deficiencies and toxin proficiencies, including those nudged along by immune suppressing allopathic interventions. The most frequently used of which is what allopathy gained its global dominance upon: antibiotics. The article linked above references some of the most dangerous infections around, which are referred to as nosocomial. Nosocomial infections are those spread within the medical or hospital setting and they are almost always resistant to multiple forms of antibiotic treatment. We were tricked into believing that modern medicine had all the answers regarding infectious disease on planet earth much the way we were duped into believing that government can solve the very problems government creates. Pharmaceutical medicine created the so-called superbugs in the first place. What reasonable human with a lick of common sense left in him believes that a problem can be solved from within the same consciousness that created it? While I am on the topic of common sense, what reasonable human being believes that the Federal Reserve can solve the problem of inflation (which it creates) by giving us more of the same? I can almost hear the minds of modern medicine now:
"If only we could make the antibiotics more powerful!"
It's not enough that you are indiscriminately wiping out all of the good flora along with the ones that you don't like, now you want to kill more. Why not just replenish with Dr. Ohhira's Probiotics 12+ instead? Silver hydrosol anyone? Clear the terrain and change what grows there.
Unfortunately, it makes far too much sense and too little money to restore function to the excretory system and the digestive system while simultaneously reducing free radical inflammation. If we did that instead of drugging every disease we can name, the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex would need an overdose of erectile dysfunction drugs just so it could pretend to be vital enough to maintain its monopoly on disease care. Or, we could just pop a Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibiting drug and pretend all is well. Somehow, I think that the price of multi-drug resistant pathogens is too high a price to pay, even with all the free Prozac we can consume in our tap water. What about you?
Drugs, Vaccines or Nutrition?
UK to force drugmakers to share info "Until a drug has been used by millions of people, the rarest and deadliest side effects may remain unknown." I have often called vaccination a form of Russian Roulette, except that with each violation of a child's dermal layers the bullet always goes in. What you don't know is when it will explode.
Drug companies play a similar game with their synthetic ingestibles, but at least the scientific community acknowledges their toxicity and the mortality rate is widely disseminated. This is why responsible doctors (not totally an oxymoron) warn their patients not to take a drug within five years of receiving FDA approval. It is in those formative years in the monopoly market for drugs that all the "unexpected" deleterious effects are reported. It is fairly simple to cover them up during the approval phase of a drug's history (see Vioxx for one) but much more difficult to hide once people in the real world start dropping like flies on the new meds.
When it comes to vaccination, medical authorities are loathe to link anything deleterious to them, lest compliance rates start dropping precipitously. Why is it that vaccinations have been elevated to unquestionable sacrament? Is it not reasonable to honestly and thoroughly investigate ALL of the potential long term consequences of artificial antibody stimulation? Vaccine-worshippers, whether heavy in a science background or not, attack those who merely question the lack of long-term safety data, even if those questioners are not anti-vaccination.
And what if someone is anti-vaccination? He is treated as a heretic rather than met on the merits of his argument. It is said that if people stopped vaccinating, the whole world would run amok with diseases supposedly eradicated by pharmaceutical injection. While it may be true that certain diseases may become more prevalent by reducing reliance upon the suppression techniques of allopathic medicine, the argument that more people will die is based on abject ignorance of natural healing principles.
Vaccine-apologists are not even aware that they are super-glued to the dogma of an immature understanding of the immune system, based upon Louis Pasteur's Germ Theory. It is NOT true that the mere presence of or contact with a pathogen results in disease, much less death from it. The truth is that coming into contact with disease-causing organisms (pathogens), whether exogenous or endogenous is a normal EVERYDAY occurrence, typically not even resulting in a sniffle.
Even the dreaded polio virus, which was on its way out without Salk's intervention, did not cause paralysis in everyone that it touched. A healthy person might not even know he contracted the virus, but by virtue of his functioning immune system remained largely asymptomatic in overcoming the potentially paralytic virus.
Given that some were immune compromised and did succumb to the viral infection with disastrous results, is vaccination the ONLY way to prevent paralysis to polio, for example? Of course that's an absurd supposition and completely ignores the identification of the Law of the Terrain by Antione Béchamp. When you are healthy and you have a fully functioning immune system, your body has the know-how and the capability to fend off attacks from any microbe known or unknown to man.
Perhaps this is shocking to read, because generations have been to taught to fear the microbe, despite the fact that it is the terrain that determines what can actually grow in it.
In homeopathy, we can also use the "polio" nosode to gently sensitize the immune system and alert it to any potential pathogenic presence. This is done without any danger of causing the disease upon which you are focusing, much less an iatrogenic death caused by the allopathic vaccine intervention.
Should one succumb to any given disease, it is ALSO not true that there is nothing that you can do except antibiotics and other toxic drugs. Whether it be homeopathic medicine, silver hydrosol, olive leaf, oregano oil, garlic, mushrooms, liver support or thousands of other substances and holistic techniques, there are numerous methods to assist a "victim" of microbial overgrowth.
Those that decry an honest discussion regarding the best way to prevent and treat disease, do not understand the concept of treating the whole person rather than the disease. Give me the capability to restore full energy and function to the immune system and I care not what "named disease" is encountered, it will be countered. Don't fear the fever. Embrace it and support it and keep it within safe limits (much higher than most people are willing to admit) and watch the beauty and brilliance of the natural world do its job as if according to some higher plan.
If you are concerned about fever, remember homeopathic phosphorus (homeopathic belladonna for children). If you catch it early enough, remember homeopathic Aconitum.
Who is responsible? The person who relies upon artificial immunity with unknown long term consequences (think chronic diseases of degradation) or the person who does everything within his power to shore up optimal immune function should life do what life does. Life is pro-life, it seeks to strengthen us by experience. Although I tolerate your "belief" in vaccination, I demand that you respect my understanding of the biological milieu as one that needs not rely on allopathic sorcery for its survival.
Whether it be drugs or vaccination, if the damage happens to your child, the risk is 100%. Whether you believe that I am right or wrong in my perspective on the immune system, you cannot justify forced compliance with pharmaceutical intervention as long as one child may die as a result of your public health enforced compassion. What say you?
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Wendy's shooter had turbulent home life, reports reveal "Blake was taking prescription medication but investigators said they had no indication mental illness played a role." Too bad he was not on a placebo. What does it take to remove the obstacle that prevents even those enraged from taking innocent human life? Severe hypoglycemia is one way. In addition to messing with brain chemistry, psychiatric drugs are known to cause havoc to the pancreas, thus worsening an already dangerous metabolic situation. The condition known as hypoglycemia results in a lack of "sugar" to the higher functions of the brain, thereby relegating a former human to temporary animal status, by forcing sole reliance on the instinctual lower brain. The animal brain has no morality. A cornered animal is capable of unfathomable acts of violence, as is a troubled hypoglycemic on brain medication. Instead of messing with brain chemistry, they should be replenishing the diminished stores of CHROMIUM, as well as utilizing homeopathic Lycopodium and Iris to further restore pancreatic integrity. Relying on fast processed food is no way to restore healthy life. Whether it's a school shooting or senseless murder at Wendy's, these tragedies will not stop until we fill in the vacuous pharmaceutical paradigm with nutritional common sense. Is that too much to ask? At this point, I'm not askin', I'm tellin'. We have far too many psychiatric-induced shootings to be polite...