Showing posts with label Magnesium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Magnesium. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Jonathan Emord, Scientific Free Speech, Dr. Carolyn Dean Talks Cancer Reversal and More on The Robert Scott Bell Show April 13, 2011:


Robert Scott Bell Show April 13, 2011:

Dr. Carolyn Dean joins me to talk cancer detection. Are the new blood screening techniques legitimate or are they designed to trap unsuspecting patients in expensive invasive procedures that lead to even more problems? http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7394133.html We’ll also talk stomach acid, cholesterol, enzymes, magnesium, Codex alimentarius and being blinded by science! http://www.naturalnews.com/031802_blinded_science.html


Jonathan Emord returns to discuss the Free Speech in Science Act, The Health Freedom Act, Prior Restraint and Monopoly protection for drugs. Is the FDA trying to destroy the supplement industry? How can we remove the FDA from health claims jurisdiction? The FDA Dragon Slayer will tell us! Also, what’s the update on the U.S.T.A’s lawsuit against Obamacare? http://newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan185.htm and http://www.emord.com/Jonathan-Emord.html


Judges need snack breaks too! Why you may want to know if your judge is hypoglycemic BEFORE you enter the courtroom! http://bodyodd.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/04/11/6453226-much-like-toddlers-judges-need-snack-breaks


With U.S. Pharma’s 887 new drugs and vaccines in the pipeline – why does the Obama Administration insist that we need a new Taxpayer supported research facility for new drugs? http://www.pharmatimes.com/Article/11-04-11/US_pharma_s_record_887_cancer_drugs_vaccines_now_in_R_D.aspx


Listen live here: http://www.naturalnews.com/NNRN-LiveStream.asp

or here: http://www.talkstreamlive.com/talk_radio/robert_scott_bell.stream

Sign up for email alerts here: www.NaturalNews.com/RobertScottBell

Previous episodes of the Robert Scott Bell Show: http://www.naturalnews.com/NNRN-Archive.asp

Thursday, October 8, 2009

"Grow Bone Skeletal Integrity" podcast link

Grow Bone Skeletal Integrity -- Over-emphasis on calcium has made millions of women susceptible to pharmaceutical propaganda, convincing them that they suffer from a drug-deficiency disease. I assure you, osteoporosis is not evidence of the lack of Boniva and Fosamax. The musculoskeletal system requires a symphony of trace elements from living food sources in order to maintain (much less regain) its integrity.

Jordan Rubin returns to let us know how to get one of 35,000 Grow Bone Systems that will be given away for FREE on October 10th at 10AM. What is the role of strontium, vanadium, magnesium and silica in bone health? Have you checked into the Weston A. Price Foundation yet?

More updates on the upcoming Rethinking AIDS Conference November 6-8, 2009. Hope to see you there!

It started, but there's still time to sign up for the Health Summit Series. Sign up by clicking here.

Podcast link here: http://askrsb.podbean.com/2009/10/08/bone-up-skeletal-integrity-1042009-hour-1/

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Bisphosphonates: The New Jawbreakers for Adults

Headline: Osteoporosis Drug Prompts Increase in Certain Bone Cells "Use of bisphosphonates has been associated with other problems in the past, including an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (a type of abnormal heart rhythm), unusual fractures of the thigh bone and inflammatory eye disease."

I have been warning Sally Field about this but she must have the cotton balls from the numerous Boniva pill bottles she is peddling stuffed in her ears.

What pharmaceutical drugheads fail to realize is that in nature, everything has a purpose. Just because a drug can stop normal cellular bone breakdown from occurring does not mean that it is a good idea.

Rather that stopping needed cellular breakdown, scientists should study and try to understand why new bone cells are not being created appropriately in osteoporosis sufferers. Since there is no drug that can promote legitimate and healthy bone growth, don't look for such a study to appear anytime soon.

Courtesy of the Robert Scott Bell Show, here's your scientific shortcut: Silica, Magnesium, Potassium, Boron and other critical nutrients deficient in osteoporosis sufferers can never be synthesized to have the positive effect that they have in their naturally occurring, food-grown nutritional state.

Sally Field, step away from the Boniva and pick up some dietary supplements.

Headline: Study Links Osteoporosis Drugs to Jaw Trouble ... the finding "does not mean that women should stop taking the drug if they're on it. It does mean that there may be more frequent side effects than was previously known."

Of course, if Magnesium caused severe jaw disfigurement, Dick Durbin, Henry Waxman and the FDA would call for its immediate withdrawal from the market. I wonder if then we could get any celebrity endorsements for nutrients over drugs?

Fossy Jaw (and I do not mean Bob Fosse's jaw) is a growing problem in women relying upon drugs instead of nutrition to prevent and reverse osteoporosis. Perhaps they could just repackage Fosamax as a chewable by putting it in a hard candy ball with loads of sugar and multiple artificial colors and flavors.

Truth in labeling would make it the Jawbreaker to end all Jawbreakers. Granted, it may be harder to market to Sally Field...

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

"Hearty 'heave-ho' Given Good Heart Health Research" commentary by Christopher C. Barr

Vitamin pills don’t prevent heart disease, prominently declared the AP (Associated Propagandaess) “news” headline representative of other “news” coverage given an annual meeting of the American Hurt, er, uh, I mean, Heart, Association.

Heart disease has primarily to do with mineral deficiencies – notably of chromium, selenium, silicon and magnesium – so well grounded nutrition researchers wouldn’t be looking in the direction of vitamin pills.

Specifically, the study noted in the report was on vitamins C and E. Very few nutrition researchers would look to vitamin C for heart help. A few more would look to vitamin E though that would be misguided.

The study much ballyhooed by the mainstream press in general is – to quote the bard – much ado about nothing, or at least not very much at all. It was funded by the National Institutes of Health – your tax dollars at work and a wasted work at that.

Barely getting any attention at all was another study presented at the same meeting disclosing that daily aspirin therapy did not provide any benefit against heart problems. The AP “news” service made not so much as a mention of it.

Aspirin studies that show heart benefit do not use plain aspirin – they use buffered aspirin. The buffering agent in buffered aspirin is a hefty dose of magnesium – one of the primary minerals of which deficiency contributes to heart problems.

The benefit of magnesium supplementation to individuals with active heart problems was first documented half a century ago before the first buffered aspirin heart studies were conducted.

Aspirin as a benefit for the heart is a very old canard indeed.

Round and round and round it goes …

The AP article linked above did in its conclusion report that another study with vitamins B-12 and folic acid showed no benefit to the heart.

The vitamins B-12 and folic acid reverse homocysteine to the amino acid methionine.

Homocysteine is a long time demonstrated heart risk indicator though it was long ignored until recent years.

Tragically, more often ignored to this day is that the key to homocysteine issues are pyridoxal compounds commonly known as vitamin B6.

Homocysteine builds up when there is insufficient vitamin B6 to properly metabolize the essential amino acid methionine.

In other words, using vitamin B-12 and folic acid to reverse homocysteine to methionine without addressing the vitamin B6 deficiency that caused the problem in the first place means that homocysteine will form again. The homocysteine problem never really goes away but rather comes and goes back and forth in a not so merry-go-round and round robin of bird-brained medical minds lacking much in nutrition knowledge even as so many are lack much in nutrition.

Drug pushers protect their turf

Having drug pushers conduct nutrition research is like having foxes guarding chickens.

A straw man argument is when one sets up an argument, assigns it to another, and then burns up that argument while claiming to have discredited another who didn’t even believe that in the first place.

Straw man arguments are the stock in trade of medical men when they argue about nutrition.

Medical men push drugs that you have to appear before them and pay tribute (office vi$it) to get permission to access. You don’t need their permission to access nutrition so they have no motivation for making use of nutrition.

Another case in point is the story this week that purports to extend statin drug usage even to those without high cholesterol levels.

Statin drugs are already the number one selling drug in America and the new push by these drug pushers would increase that almost 50 per cent. Yet the study noted numerous side effects from the statins including higher levels of diabetics occurring in those taking the statins … oh, and by the way, diabetics have three to five times as much heart disease as non-diabetics.

Yet, for considerably less than half the cost of statins the ingestion of the essential mineral chromium in a 100 per cent whole food form in hearty (pun intended) amounts results in a decrease of LDL (“bad”) cholesterol that statins provide plus an increase of HDL (“good”) cholesterol that statins do NOT provide with none of the many serious side effects that statins provide.

No permission or tribute to doctors needed for a hearty nutritional approach.

Finally, at the same time as all these other storied medical studies comes word that the AMA has come out in support of trans fats bans. No mention is made that the common place use of trans fats resulted from rigorous recommendations for many decades from the AMA for their use. Meanwhile nutrition people who have cried out against trans fats these many decades that AMA has recommended them do not even get a mention.

The AMA declared that stopping use of trans fats would prevent 100,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. If that is true then the AMA has just admitted liability for 100,000 deaths per year in the United States alone based upon their many decades recommendations of trans fats.

Read in NATURALLY Speaking about simple, plain truths years – even decades – ahead of the mainstream.

Christopher C. Barr writes Naturally Speaking from Arkansas: The Natural State … naturally! You may write him at P. O. Box 1147, Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455 or by e-mail at servantofYHVH@hotmail.com.


Created with Admarket's flickrSLiDR.