Showing posts with label Chromium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chromium. Show all posts

Thursday, June 11, 2009

RSBell Lecture at Health Freeom Expo: Pandemic Protection, Part 1, Friday 4 PM CDT

Pandemic Protection, Part 1

Summary: Are fears over the Influenza A-H1N1 founded in reality or hype? Whether they are or not, it is time to know what you can do to protect your family in case a legitimate viral threat comes your way.

"How can I prevent it? What do I do if I already have it?"
One substance on planet earth is most ideal at combating viral threats while simultaneously supporting your own immune system to get you back to strength and vitality. Find out why Big Pharma does not want you to know about it!

Robert will also cover supplemental therapies to eradicate secondary infections and open up detoxification pathways for complete healing. Included in the lecture will be discussion on silver hydrosol, vaccinations, probiotics, selenium, chromium and numerous homeopathic medicines specific to help you get through any immune threat.

Day: Friday at 4 p.m. CDT

Room: Utopia D

Sunday, July 13, 2008

What the Mainstream Media Missed About the Oncological Death of Tony Snow

Headline: Tony Snow, Former White House Press Secretary and FOX News Anchor, Dies at 53 "Snow had his colon removed and underwent six months of chemotherapy...in 2005. In 2007 he announced his cancer had recurred and spread to his liver, and he had a malignant growth removed from his abdominal area."

This is another unfortunate casualty of the war on cancer. I do not necessarily believe that having more money or good "insurance" necessarily results in the best treatment -- especially as it relates to cancer. No amount of slashing, burning and poisoning can change the fact that the field of oncology is operating under the wrong assumption when it shoots to kill. Cancer cells are not the result of some evil plot to destroy the cells of the body.

When the soil is so devoid of key nutrients and rife with toxic poisons it cannot sustain healthy plant life. How is it that we expect to sustain a healthy cellular environment when we starve the body of vital trace elements and instead rely upon synthetic poisons for our sustenance? Ignorance? Naiveté? Or perhaps we have been purposefully indoctrinated into the belief that cancer is a random act?

In any case, we do a great disservice to the coming generations if we perpetuate the myth that we are all potential "victims" of diseases such as cancer. If the universe operated by chance it would have flown apart long ago. Cause and effect are very real and exacting in the worlds of creation. If you suffer from a disease of deficiency, does it make good sense to do medical treatments that actually worsen the deficiency? If you suffer from a disease of toxicity, does it seem all that intelligent to add to the toxic burden of the body as a standard course of treatment? If your body is rife with inflammation, who would subject your tissues to compounds that actually exacerbate that already overwhelming inflammatory cascade?

Doctors actually go to school to get their degrees in such absurdity. Government even licenses medical professions to do exactly that which seems so absurd from my previous paragraph. I would suppose that only government could be so stupid, but then we have to acknowledge the industry that bought such monopolistic and deadly favor in the first place. In 2008, would humans still sell out other humans for profit and power? Of course. The evidence is the cancer industry and the government's war on alternative, natural and unconventional cancer therapies. Ultimately it is a war against freedom.

Cancer is not the cause of anyone's death. It is the result of a long term, major imbalance in normal metabolic functions. In the case of children, the "long term" decline is cross-generational as each succeeding generation seemingly succumbs at a younger age. The allopathic paradigm is a classic mental disorder that views all life in terms of war. The followers of the Caduceus symbol believe that you are only healthy as long as you can keep some "enemy" at bay. Never mind that life is strongest when all of creation knows its place and works together for optimal health. Are you healthier when your cells do battle with each other or when they work together towards some sort of homeostasis?

"The caduceus is associated with Hermes (Mercury), the messenger of the gods, also known as the god of trickery, wealth and death! Whoops."

Tony Snow just happens to be one of the more famous victims of the medical industrial complex. It matters not how learned you are, being duped by allopathic sleight of hand is very common. For some reason, it's O.K. to be intelligent in most endeavors, but when it comes to the care of our bodies, intelligence is intimidated away at the sight of a white lab coat, stethoscope and a license from government. I have referenced the "00" status before, but there is no other profession that actually has a license to kill (other than the military).

Where were the doctors counseling Tony Snow regarding a raw, organic whole food diet? Where was the emphasis on detoxification? Which medical professional forgot to tell Tony that Selenium is a critical nutrient in the restoration of his body's healthy integrity? I realize that we all have the freedom to choose our own path in life, but it is a bit troubling that so many people are picking a medical path based upon fear induction due to censored or mis-information. When you are duped buying an automobile, you might get a lemon. If it happens when trying to decide medical or non-medical treatment, you might lose your life.

This, of course, is the argument used to limit your choice to any cancer therapy you want, as long as its delivered by licensed oncologists. After all, if you choose wrong you may die. It's a bit disingenuous when those same arguers are silent when the choice made is medical and the patient dies anyway -- as if that patient is any less dead. Why do we not hear of all the success stories from those who healed from cancer using natural means? Where are the feel-good stories of natural cancer cures? There are plenty of them, however, if they get too much media daylight, "Cancer, Incorporated" will not look so good by comparison.

The death of Tony Snow is another among the many thousands of allopathic intervention failures that occur every year. His doctors will be lauded for their heroic efforts in trying to save his life. Just imagine if "natural" doctors had attempted the same thing by utilizing "complementary" therapies with the same results. Rather than lauded as heroes, they would likely be indicted for murder. Double standard? That's medical tyranny infringing on the right of every American to freely choose which health care method or substance that he believes is best.

If you think government can do it better, you're an obtuse non-observer of history who probably still believes that cancer is evidence of a chemotherapy deficiency. O.K., that's harsh, but that's the way I feel. Rush is right. Dr. Benjamin Rush, that is:

"Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of the Republic should make a special privilege for medical freedoms as well as religious freedom."

My heart goes out to the family of Tony Stone, but I know that the mainstream media will ignore the important lesson imparted by his passing. If you believe in liberty, you must support ending the cancer treatment monopoly on our shores. It is embarrassing for the people of a "free" country to have to leave it just because their government does not endorse the alternative methods they may wish to utilize.

Why did our forefathers leave England and ultimately form a new nation? It certainly wasn't because they wanted a government to limit their access, knowledge and practice of natural healing therapies. Anything in the Declaration about that? Constitutional republic or cancer tyranny -- which do you want for your kids? Should your child create cancer later in life, wouldn't you want him or her to have the freedom to choose any method for recovery, even (or especially) if it's natural?

The podcast on this topic can be heard by linking here: http://www.switchpod.com/f77687.html?puser=none

Saturday, May 3, 2008

"Indicting Abusers of Pregnant Teens" Guest Commentary by Christopher C. Barr

Young women and significant numbers of teenagers pregnant in an environment that confines them from knowing any other way or even knowing that there is reason to question their lot in life are in the news.

No, this is not about an isolated religious group in west Texas. This is a larger group affected in greater numbers over a much wider area by a combination of far more diabolical associations hiding in plain sight.

These American diabolical associations (ADA) isolate these pregnant young women and girls preventing knowledge that there is any other way to live.

It was revealed this week that there has been a doubling of young pregnant women already afflicted by full blown diabetes. A dramatically greater almost six-fold increase of teenage pregnant girls already afflicted by full blown and adult diabetes – adult diabetes in those not yet even adults.

This news came in part by way of an American Diabetes Association (ADA) journal that emphasized after the fact medical approaches like insulin pumps while ignoring the before the fact nutritional matter that adult onset, Type II diabetes arises due to a gross deficiency of the nutrient mineral chromium. Diabetes is not the result of a lack of insulin in the diet.

Gross chromium deficiency occurs due to standard American dietary (SAD) choices that these ADA refuse to warn against, and even promote in the case of American Dietary Association operatives with exclusive and isolated control of institutionalized facilities.

A federal diabolical association (FDA) permits the annihilation of chromium from the food supply in violation of its own rules under the Wiley Act more commonly known as the Pure Food & Drug Act (PFDA).

This FDA allows pure, whole food grain to be dramatically adulterated with the result that 91 per cent of chromium is removed even though the United States Supreme Court ruled this to be a violation of PFDA almost 100 years ago.

The FDA also allows pure, whole food sugar cane to be dramatically adulterated with the result that 98 per cent of chromium is removed.

More than 90 per cent of chromium is therefore removed from nearly half the SAD (manipulated) choices of all Americans including the pregnant young women and girls earlier referenced.

Almost 50 years ago research scientists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) discovered that the mineral chromium was vital for sugar metabolism. Soon thereafter the federal government recognized chromium as an essential mineral nutrient (meaning you can’t live without it) for its required role in blood sugar metabolism.

The federal government did not bring its practices in line with these new findings as they continued to undermine their own rules, regulations and just plain ol’ common sense.

The last 100 years have seen a dramatic escalation of consumption of foods stripped of almost all chromium. This results in each successive generation starting life with less chromium and running out faster and faster with each successive generation. That has resulted in constantly and dramatically escalating levels of diabetes occurring – and in younger and younger ages – while ADA and FDA groups stand by encouraging harmful practices.

The mainstream media promotes this harm as well with an ever growing polluted stream of advertising and “news”/propaganda stories.

It was also disclosed (though barely mentioned) in the journal article that the highest increase of all for pregnant women already diabetic was in those women older than 40. Only one of three mainstream news reports even deigned to mention this fact.

Discovery was made 40 years ago that a dramatic number of Americans had no detectable chromium levels by the age of 40 years. Conditions leading to that dismal fact have only worsened since then.

Also disclosed in this journal article is that diabetic pregnancies result in escalating numbers of birth defects.

The most exhaustive encyclopedic textbook on nutrition noted 25 years ago that the mineral chromium helps to maintain genetic integrity of the cell.

Almost 5 years ago chromium deficiency was noted as the logical key to birth defects in my own book on chromium connecting together the facts noted above. Subsequent to this numerous medical journal articles have reported (as though stunning news) that elevated blood sugar levels even among non-diabetic resulted in dramatically increased birth defect rates – though they never mention the mineral chromium.

This assault of American diabolical associations on pregnant (and non-pregnant) women and children (men, too) is at the very least a matter of criminal neglect.

Co-conspirators

Also disclosed in the past week is that the FDA did not publish or proclaim the news about more Merck magic (of the black variety) in contamination of children’s vaccines and bulk vaccine lots as part of 49 separate “areas of concern” and neglect. This covered more than 30 not-unexpected-inspections in a period of 90 days following up another major contamination episode of a common children’s vaccine.

One major pharmaceutical industry analyst noted that this was not unusual referring to it as “typical” thereby dismissing this multitude of findings as unimportant.

A mainstream news source reported that a Center for Disease Creation-trol and Promo-evention (CDC) spokesman noted the agency is not taking action because it “is not aware of problems with vaccines at the plant”.

You don’t suppose that the CDC "see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, speak-no-evil" inaction is compromised in any way by the intrinsic and considerable financial largesse they receive due to the vaccination paradigm?

Christopher C. Barr writes Naturally Speaking from Arkansas: The Natural State … naturally! You may write him at P. O. Box 1147, Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455 or by e-mail at servantofYHVH@hotmail.com.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Insulin Bong Linked to Cancer; GTF Chromium & Homeopathy Safer

Pfizer warns of lung cancer with inhaled insulin "...it updated the product's labeling to include a warning with safety information about lung cancer cases found in patients..." If only they knew that insulin (or the lack thereof) wasn't the real problem.

  • Abject chromium deficiency is not corrected by sucking on a tube of vaporized insulin.
  • The game of "Life on Drugs" relies upon keeping us ignorant as to the true cause of disease.

How many millions of people are traveling down the diabetic death road merely because they have not been made aware of the true cause of their problem? It's not a small number. It's astonishing all the more because of the ease with which it can be reversed by simple dietary and lifestyle changes.

I know that each week I have many more readers and radio listeners, so for their benefit, I will reiterate some of the most basic steps to take to reverse course from a life of diabetic decline.

First and foremost, switch to whole, organic, unprocessed foods as much as possible. Supplement with food grown GTF Chromium, 100 mcg 3-4 times daily. Obviously, refined carbohydrates and artificial sweeteners are pure poison.

The two key homeopathic remedies for pancreatic function are Lycopodium and Iris which can be taken in low attenuation (pick one: 6x, 6c, 10x, 12x, 12c, 15x) prior to meals.

The Pfizer warning means nothing to people who no longer rely on synthetic "solutions" to organic problems. Why not join those of us who have unplugged from the pharmaceutical matrix? Don't worry, the red pill is not a drug...

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Vytorin Does Not Work; Here's What Does...


Trial: Popular cholesterol drug fails to improve heart disease "The results show the drug had "no result -- zilch. In no subgroup, in no segment, was there any added benefit" for reducing plaque, said Dr. John Kastelein, the Dutch scientist who led the study." What was the previous title? "Vytorin doesn't work." Ouch. No wonder they had to change it to something a bit softer. Where is the FTC on this?

If a dietary supplement made claims as to its ability to accomplish some healthy goal and then was proved to be worthless, you know that there would be fine$ galore. Maybe there would even be congressional hearings where Dick Durbin would decry the dangerousness and worthlessness of all dietary supplements.

Vytorin does not work.

Of course it doesn't, for it does not address the real cause of cardiovascular disease. You do not get a heart attack because you have a lack of vitamin Vytorin in your system. However, if you have a deficiency of chromium, selenium, silica and essential fats, you can be sure that you are well on your way to circulatory decline.

If you want to take a drug for heart disease, at least make it homeopathic. The most critical of heart related remedies is Crataegus, otherwise known as the Hawthorn Berry. The homeopathic snake venoms such as Vipera, Lachesis and Crotalus horridus are also very helpful to everything circulatory. Perhaps the most overlooked homeopathic remedy for vascular issues is Rhus toxicodendron, because of its affinity for uric acid (which also makes it good for musculoskeletal inflammation). While we are on the subject of cardiovascular integrity, Pulsatilla is another critical remedy that helps to purify the blood for those interested in real solutions instead of the quack medicine Vytorin.

The statin drug family is doing more to help people lose their minds under the guise of FDA approval than any other drug category. If Henry Waxman cries about my perspective on real remedies for the heart, perhaps that is evidence that his mind has already been donated to the drugs of Big Pharma. That goes double for John Dingell.

A Ruthless Dictator Gene is Born Every Minute?


'Ruthlessness gene' discovered "...there was a link to the length of the AVPR1a gene: people were more likely to behave selfishly the shorter their version of this gene." Are the study authors trying to say that dictators are born, not created? Perhaps it is because they have AVPR1a Envy. What causes genes to express? The environment. Simple hypoglycemia is enough to turn a benevolent dictator into a ruthless totalitarian. This is the problem with a scientific community that has no earthly idea who Antoine Béchamp is. Everything is genetic determinism to them. Never mind that you can change your genes by what you believe and do. As long as you are held in a genetic box, it is fairly easy to force you to comply because of "bad" genes.

Do you have heart disease genes? Garbage. You may have a predisposition that follows certain patterns of degradation, but those patterns never have to emerge unless you do the things that cause them to manifest.

In some people, metabolic wastes including uric acid, cause inflammation within the circulatory system. This arterial and venous inflammation necessitates the patching and repair processes that are supposed to occur. Of course, if you are completely unaware this is happening, you'll go right on leading the lifestyle that brought about this chronic metabolic disease.

In some people, these same accumulating metabolic wastes situate themselves in the musculoskeletal system, causing inflammation and pain that is often diagnosed as arthritis. Same cause, two different results. In both cases, if the diet and lifestyle are changed so that either the wastes are produced less or excreted more efficiently, then the disease for which you are "programmed" (according to the determinists) would never manifest.

In the case of hypoglycemia, if ruthless dictators had only had adequate chromium stores, things might have turned out differently. I don't care how long your AVPR1a gene is, if you are nutritionally deficient and unaware, all bets are off. If you would like to learn more about gene expression and the biology of complementary medicine, visit the web domain of Dr. Bruce Lipton. Now, if you are looking for a gene for insensitivity, that would be Neal Boortz...


Created with Admarket's flickrSLiDR.