A thoughtful letter of thanks from a listener in Alaska

Dr. Bell,

Greetings and salutations from up north. May I also say that I greatly appreciate the helpful information that occurred yesterday. Amazing thing happened when my wife and I drove into the "big" city of Anchorage. As luck would have it, I happened upon two old friends and one of them mentioned that they'd recently heard you on the Michael Savage radio show. Although she already knew about whole food GTF Chromium from the show, I did manage to pass along some encouraging words, which I'd previously received from you. Believe me, these words were well taken, since they both had diabetes. I could easily tell that hope was surely kindled. So, as you can see, your words are far reaching and making their way even through the heartland of Alaska. I hope this bit of info confirms that your message is indeed getting out and encourages you, in spite of the FDA, the AMA, & etcetera, to the contrary.

I've personally observed what happens when some people come to realize the importance of an awesomely astounding piece of information and they grasp the absolute significance that it holds for mankind. They immediately seize the moment and act upon it. Others may come upon the exact same place and never realize the importance or it's full ramification. What becomes a mission for one, is a mere footnote for most others. You, I believe, have rightly seized this moment and have risen to the occasion. The wounded and countless afflicted are waiting to hear your healing words. May an army respond and help carry the assault forward ... and may God's spirit be with you.

Very Cordially,

Jerry Henry

RSB comments:

Jerry, I am humbled to know of the impact of these healing messages beyond the confines of the short time I have on radio each week. Special thanks to all of my longtime listeners in Alaska on 650 KENI, one of my oldest and most loyal affiliates after 8 years! May the blessings continue to flow to all those who need healing...

NC Medical Board Drops All Charges Against Dr. Rashid Buttar Exclusive Interview (plus Desiree Jennings update)

Join us for this world exclusive, uncensored and candid podcast interview with Dr. Rashid Buttar in the wake of the North Carolina medical board dropping all charges against him.

We discuss what to do when state boards of medicine attack integrative and holistically-minded doctors with consent decrees presented under threat, duress and coercion. Has Dr. Buttar revealed the roadmap for other doctors to use in defense of advanced, largely non-drug medical practice?

We also talk about the AMA and its support of Obama-care, views of the Founding Fathers, including Thomas Jefferson, and the role of freedom in correcting what is wrong with health care in America.

• What does it mean to uphold and protect the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic?

• Could better nutrition be the key to seeing the truth and acting upon it?

• Why is the government declaring people who believe in freedom enemies of the state?

• What does it mean when state boards claim that you are not practicing evidence based medicine?

Dr. Buttar let's them have it!

We also cover healing cancer by restoring the free flow of energy in the body – including lymphatic and emotional aspects to recovery.

What are people saying about Dr. Buttar's new book “The Nine Steps to Keep the Doctor Away”? If you decide to order the book, please be sure to use code “1358” so that you will get a free DVD with every book purchase.

Finally, we conclude with an update on Desiree Jennings, the Washington Redskins cheerleader who made headlines around the world after being severely injured by the 2009 flu shot. The mainstream media avoided covering the commonality of injuries from the seasonal and swine flu shot, especially among young adults in their 20's, including many miscarriages.

This world exclusive covers more in 47 minutes than the pharmaceutically-conflicted mainstream media does in a year!

Podcast link: http://askrsb.podbean.com/2010/04/07/nc-medical-board-drops-all-charges-against-dr-rashid-buttar-exclusive-interview/

Abraham Cherrix and his mom Rose speak out about 13-year-old Minnesota boy Daniel Hauser and state-forced chemotherapy

You may remember the story about a Virginia boy and his family's battle to prevent the state from forcing him to accept chemotherapy and radiation treatment for cancer. He won and he is alive and well today.

If you would like to catch up on his story, click here.

If anyone has a perspective on state-sponsored medical terrorism, Abraham and his mother Rose do. They need to be heard regarding this new case in Minnesota where the state is, once again, mandating cancer treatments against the will and beliefs of child and family.

Abraham's comment:

I've mulled it over and over in my mind so many times, and I can't even fathom why this case exists. We're talking about about a 13 year old boy here, he's got a life threatening disease.... and while he does have a learning disability, his parents are intelligent enough to make decisions for him.

For years the AMA has claimed chemo and radiation is the only way to cure cancer. They won't consider or test other possibilities, and for their ignorance and selfishness this child is suffering the consequences.

THESE ARE DOCTORS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. They're known as the saviors of our time, they are idols for many.... modern gods who perform miracles.... and they want to force a young man to have a treatment that he and his parents are against? OH that's right, I forgot, the courts have the last word about what you can do with your body. Minor detail.

So what will it be in the end? Will they strap him to a table like in some sci-fi movie and inject him with harmful chemicals? Or will he perhaps be held at bay by fellow nurses and doctors alike, unable to lash out as the needle is inserted into his arm? What will they do when he looks them in the eyes and says NO? More importantly.... will we, or his parents, ever know these answers?

This story needs to be more public. The press needs to follow it religiously, there's more here than meets the eye. Maybe someday we'll know these truths, and people like this young man's parents will not have to be accused of something they never intended to do. But hey, I suppose they think it's ok..... save a life (?) and ruin a family. That's their job, right?

Rose's comment:

We feel the pain that family is experiencing. The stress that they have put on the child will only make his cancer worse. If they are so concerned about him then they need to give what the parents are doing time to work. Chemo works quickly but also kills the good cells as well as the bad. The doctor even commented that it would be hard to give chemo to him if he refused. Who is going to be the one who forcibly holds him down and straps him down so he can't pull the needle out of him. Who is going to be the one who drugs him so he can't resist. And when he resist their poison they will say he is of danger to him and others so they then have the right to restrict his movements or drug him. I would like the names of the doctor's, lawyers, social workers, state officials / agencies, and everyone else involved in "forcing" him to have chemo. That way I will know who to encourage his parents to sue if his cancer returns like my son's did after only 2 months. He had chemo. It is not a cure. Who do they sue when they have killed his immune system so it can't fight back. It is having problems fighting back now because of the damage already done. And what about when he has the side effects of the chemo and radiation 5 to 9 years down the road, one of which is leukemia and ten times harder to fight.

I think all of the following speaks for itself. So what are they sentencing the boy to: life or death

The following is a quote from the American Cancer Society's web site and booklets that they put out on the side effects of radiation:

"Some cases of leukemia are related to previous radiation exposure. Most develop within a few years of exposure, with the risk peaking at 5 to 9 years, and then slowly declining. Other types of cancer that develop after radiation exposure have been shown to take much longer to show up. These are solid tumor cancers, like cancer of the breast or lung. Most are not seen for at least 10 years after radiation exposure, and some are diagnosed even more than 15 years later."

This doesn't include during radiation.

This is what the side effects of chemo are:

• "One of the most common side effects of chemotherapy is damage to the bone marrow."
• "Certain chemotherapy drugs can damage the heart. The most common ones are the anthracyclines, such as daunorubicin and doxorubicin, but other drugs may cause heart damage as well. This occurs in about 1 in 10 people who receive these drugs and usually involves damage to the heart muscles."
• "If the heart is damaged by chemotherapy, it may not be able to pump blood through the body as well as it did before treatment. This can lead to fluid buildup and other problems known as congestive heart failure."

Note: A 15 yr. old girl with Hodgkins died in Dec. '08 because of this very side effect.

• "Side effects that are the result of nerve damage caused by chemotherapy can occur soon after chemotherapy starts or years later."
• "Studies have shown that chemotherapy may affect the way your brain functions, even many years after treatment."
• "It is possible for some chemotherapy drugs, such as bleomycin, to permanently damage the lungs."
• "Reproductive and sexual problems can occur after you receive chemotherapy."
• "The liver is the organ that breaks down (metabolizes) most of the chemotherapy drugs that enter the body. Unfortunately, some drugs can cause liver damage, including methotrexate, cytarabine, vincristine, and streptozocin."
• "Certain chemotherapy drugs such as cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide, and streptozocin are more likely to cause kidney and urinary damage than other medications."
• "Certain chemotherapy drugs may permanently damage the body's organs."
• "When young children receive chemotherapy for cancer treatment, it may affect their growth and their ability to learn."
• "Nervous system changes can develop months or years after treatment with some drugs. Signs of nerve damage may include hearing loss or tinnitus (ringing in the ears), changes in sensation (feeling) in the hands and feet, personality changes, sleepiness, impaired memory, shortened attention span, and seizures."
• "Hemorrhagic cystitis (blood in the urine), a side effect of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide, can continue for some time and even worsen after the drug is stopped."
• "Development of a second cancer is a great concern for cancer survivors. Some chemotherapy drugs raise the risk of developing another type of cancer later on."

The preceding are all quotes direct from the American Cancer Society web site.

RSB comments:

Where in the federal (or ANY state) constitution is the government given explicit powers to violate the sanctity of a family and force one of its members to undergo poisonous, unproven treatments against their will? How did they get jurisdiction?

We have a serious problem if the American people (especially the people of Minnesota, in this case) are unable to see the real danger here. When government can confiscate your children on behalf of the Medical Industrial Complex, it is clearly not operating in a manner concordant with the foundational principle "of the people, by the people and for the people."

Is cancer now a crime punishable by state-sanctioned medically-assisted homicide? Should your government be able to lawfully assault your child with deadly weapons? In the case of 13-year old Daniel Hauser, that is exactly what a Minnesota judge has ruled they can do.

What will you do when they come for your child?

"Hearty 'heave-ho' Given Good Heart Health Research" commentary by Christopher C. Barr

“Vitamin pills don’t prevent heart disease,” prominently declared the AP (Associated Propagandaess) “news” headline representative of other “news” coverage given an annual meeting of the American Hurt, er, uh, I mean, Heart, Association.

Heart disease has primarily to do with mineral deficiencies – notably of chromium, selenium, silicon and magnesium – so well grounded nutrition researchers wouldn’t be looking in the direction of vitamin pills.

Specifically, the study noted in the report was on vitamins C and E. Very few nutrition researchers would look to vitamin C for heart help. A few more would look to vitamin E though that would be misguided.

The study much ballyhooed by the mainstream press in general is – to quote the bard – much ado about nothing, or at least not very much at all. It was funded by the National Institutes of Health – your tax dollars at work and a wasted work at that.

Barely getting any attention at all was another study presented at the same meeting disclosing that daily aspirin therapy did not provide any benefit against heart problems. The AP “news” service made not so much as a mention of it.

Aspirin studies that show heart benefit do not use plain aspirin – they use buffered aspirin. The buffering agent in buffered aspirin is a hefty dose of magnesium – one of the primary minerals of which deficiency contributes to heart problems.

The benefit of magnesium supplementation to individuals with active heart problems was first documented half a century ago before the first buffered aspirin heart studies were conducted.

Aspirin as a benefit for the heart is a very old canard indeed.

Round and round and round it goes …

The AP article linked above did in its conclusion report that another study with vitamins B-12 and folic acid showed no benefit to the heart.

The vitamins B-12 and folic acid reverse homocysteine to the amino acid methionine.

Homocysteine is a long time demonstrated heart risk indicator though it was long ignored until recent years.

Tragically, more often ignored to this day is that the key to homocysteine issues are pyridoxal compounds commonly known as vitamin B6.

Homocysteine builds up when there is insufficient vitamin B6 to properly metabolize the essential amino acid methionine.

In other words, using vitamin B-12 and folic acid to reverse homocysteine to methionine without addressing the vitamin B6 deficiency that caused the problem in the first place means that homocysteine will form again. The homocysteine problem never really goes away but rather comes and goes back and forth in a not so merry-go-round and round robin of bird-brained medical minds lacking much in nutrition knowledge even as so many are lack much in nutrition.

Drug pushers protect their turf

Having drug pushers conduct nutrition research is like having foxes guarding chickens.

A straw man argument is when one sets up an argument, assigns it to another, and then burns up that argument while claiming to have discredited another who didn’t even believe that in the first place.

Straw man arguments are the stock in trade of medical men when they argue about nutrition.

Medical men push drugs that you have to appear before them and pay tribute (office vi$it) to get permission to access. You don’t need their permission to access nutrition so they have no motivation for making use of nutrition.

Another case in point is the story this week that purports to extend statin drug usage even to those without high cholesterol levels.

Statin drugs are already the number one selling drug in America and the new push by these drug pushers would increase that almost 50 per cent. Yet the study noted numerous side effects from the statins including higher levels of diabetics occurring in those taking the statins … oh, and by the way, diabetics have three to five times as much heart disease as non-diabetics.

Yet, for considerably less than half the cost of statins the ingestion of the essential mineral chromium in a 100 per cent whole food form in hearty (pun intended) amounts results in a decrease of LDL (“bad”) cholesterol that statins provide plus an increase of HDL (“good”) cholesterol that statins do NOT provide with none of the many serious side effects that statins provide.

No permission or tribute to doctors needed for a hearty nutritional approach.

Finally, at the same time as all these other storied medical studies comes word that the AMA has come out in support of trans fats bans. No mention is made that the common place use of trans fats resulted from rigorous recommendations for many decades from the AMA for their use. Meanwhile nutrition people who have cried out against trans fats these many decades that AMA has recommended them do not even get a mention.

The AMA declared that stopping use of trans fats would prevent 100,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. If that is true then the AMA has just admitted liability for 100,000 deaths per year in the United States alone based upon their many decades recommendations of trans fats.

Read in NATURALLY Speaking about simple, plain truths years – even decades – ahead of the mainstream.

Christopher C. Barr writes Naturally Speaking from Arkansas: The Natural State … naturally! You may write him at P. O. Box 1147, Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455 or by e-mail at servantofYHVH@hotmail.com.

National Kidney Foundation Slows Contribution to Kidney Disease, Halts Support of Fluoride

Headline: Lawsuits threatened over forced fluoride "Concerns about fluoridation are quickly surfacing as the National Kidney Foundation withdrew its support of the chemical additive..."

Is it really "quickly" when it's taken DECADES to acknowledge that mass-drugging of the population might not be a medically responsible practice? Do you like the idea of increasing the uptake of heavy metals in your body? As if any of us needed more.

"Fluoride in the water and mercury in their mouths" is one medically plausible reason as to the irrational and unconstitutional behavior endemic to Washington. D.C. and those that feed off it like parasites. There is growing awareness, however, as the recent reversals regarding the belief in the safety of mercury and fluoride by government regulators and private trade groups show. Perhaps the Fluoride Action Network is having an impact after all. Hats off to Dr. Paul Connett and his 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation.

It should be embarrassing for anyone with a Duh-gree to defend the mass drugging of the population with a neuro-toxic waste product (from aluminum mining, processing and other sources). If government bureaucrats finally agree to remove the fluoride, will they argue to replace it with statin drugs and SSRI's instead? Only medical collectivists could argue that it is for the "greater good" to drug EVERYBODY so that some people will not get "sick." All the while, the sickness is caused by the substance put in the water to prevent it.

One-size-fits-all prescribing is the hallmark of allopathic medicine. Impressive? This type of thinking results in hundreds of thousands of needless deaths every year. Although correcting this deranged thought form is better late than never, how many kidneys were destroyed prior to the National Kidney Foundation's withdrawal of support?

The fluoride dam is breaking. Hallelujah. Watch everyone's IQ rise accordingly. Of course, that would make the American Dental Association and American Medical Association look all the more foolish. What is the definition of justice?