Showing posts with label homocystine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homocystine. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

"Hearty 'heave-ho' Given Good Heart Health Research" commentary by Christopher C. Barr

“Vitamin pills don’t prevent heart disease,” prominently declared the AP (Associated Propagandaess) “news” headline representative of other “news” coverage given an annual meeting of the American Hurt, er, uh, I mean, Heart, Association.

Heart disease has primarily to do with mineral deficiencies – notably of chromium, selenium, silicon and magnesium – so well grounded nutrition researchers wouldn’t be looking in the direction of vitamin pills.

Specifically, the study noted in the report was on vitamins C and E. Very few nutrition researchers would look to vitamin C for heart help. A few more would look to vitamin E though that would be misguided.

The study much ballyhooed by the mainstream press in general is – to quote the bard – much ado about nothing, or at least not very much at all. It was funded by the National Institutes of Health – your tax dollars at work and a wasted work at that.

Barely getting any attention at all was another study presented at the same meeting disclosing that daily aspirin therapy did not provide any benefit against heart problems. The AP “news” service made not so much as a mention of it.

Aspirin studies that show heart benefit do not use plain aspirin – they use buffered aspirin. The buffering agent in buffered aspirin is a hefty dose of magnesium – one of the primary minerals of which deficiency contributes to heart problems.

The benefit of magnesium supplementation to individuals with active heart problems was first documented half a century ago before the first buffered aspirin heart studies were conducted.

Aspirin as a benefit for the heart is a very old canard indeed.

Round and round and round it goes …

The AP article linked above did in its conclusion report that another study with vitamins B-12 and folic acid showed no benefit to the heart.

The vitamins B-12 and folic acid reverse homocysteine to the amino acid methionine.

Homocysteine is a long time demonstrated heart risk indicator though it was long ignored until recent years.

Tragically, more often ignored to this day is that the key to homocysteine issues are pyridoxal compounds commonly known as vitamin B6.

Homocysteine builds up when there is insufficient vitamin B6 to properly metabolize the essential amino acid methionine.

In other words, using vitamin B-12 and folic acid to reverse homocysteine to methionine without addressing the vitamin B6 deficiency that caused the problem in the first place means that homocysteine will form again. The homocysteine problem never really goes away but rather comes and goes back and forth in a not so merry-go-round and round robin of bird-brained medical minds lacking much in nutrition knowledge even as so many are lack much in nutrition.

Drug pushers protect their turf

Having drug pushers conduct nutrition research is like having foxes guarding chickens.

A straw man argument is when one sets up an argument, assigns it to another, and then burns up that argument while claiming to have discredited another who didn’t even believe that in the first place.

Straw man arguments are the stock in trade of medical men when they argue about nutrition.

Medical men push drugs that you have to appear before them and pay tribute (office vi$it) to get permission to access. You don’t need their permission to access nutrition so they have no motivation for making use of nutrition.

Another case in point is the story this week that purports to extend statin drug usage even to those without high cholesterol levels.

Statin drugs are already the number one selling drug in America and the new push by these drug pushers would increase that almost 50 per cent. Yet the study noted numerous side effects from the statins including higher levels of diabetics occurring in those taking the statins … oh, and by the way, diabetics have three to five times as much heart disease as non-diabetics.

Yet, for considerably less than half the cost of statins the ingestion of the essential mineral chromium in a 100 per cent whole food form in hearty (pun intended) amounts results in a decrease of LDL (“bad”) cholesterol that statins provide plus an increase of HDL (“good”) cholesterol that statins do NOT provide with none of the many serious side effects that statins provide.

No permission or tribute to doctors needed for a hearty nutritional approach.

Finally, at the same time as all these other storied medical studies comes word that the AMA has come out in support of trans fats bans. No mention is made that the common place use of trans fats resulted from rigorous recommendations for many decades from the AMA for their use. Meanwhile nutrition people who have cried out against trans fats these many decades that AMA has recommended them do not even get a mention.

The AMA declared that stopping use of trans fats would prevent 100,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. If that is true then the AMA has just admitted liability for 100,000 deaths per year in the United States alone based upon their many decades recommendations of trans fats.

Read in NATURALLY Speaking about simple, plain truths years – even decades – ahead of the mainstream.

Christopher C. Barr writes Naturally Speaking from Arkansas: The Natural State … naturally! You may write him at P. O. Box 1147, Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455 or by e-mail at servantofYHVH@hotmail.com.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

White-washing Crestor Statin Drugs; Safer Links for Cardiovascular Concerns

Headline: Study: Wider cholesterol drug use may save lives "This takes prevention to a whole new level, because it applies to patients who we now wouldn't have any evidence to treat," said Dr. W. Douglas Weaver, a Detroit cardiologist and president of the American College of Cardiology. If I did not laugh I would cry. The cholesterol mythology matters not, they just want to make Crestor an essential nutrient. On what basis do they do this?

"People with low cholesterol and no big risk for heart disease dramatically lowered their chances of dying or having a heart attack if they took the cholesterol pill Crestor, a large study found."

OK, let's set aside for a moment the fact that cholesterol does not cause heart disease and figure out just what the "PILL" they are trying to claim here.

  • No risk for heart attack? Check.
  • Low cholesterol? Check.
So they took Crestor and still didn't die nor have a heart attack, which they were not likely to get anyway. Did the FDA approve Crestor as a new placebo against diseases that you are not likely to develop?
  • Did they ignore that statins are liver toxic? Check.
  • Did they ignore that statin drugs deplete cellular Co-Q10? Check.
  • Did they ignore that cholesterol is a vital part of the brain and nervous system? Check.
  • Did they ignore that cholesterol is a vital precursor for proper hormone production? Check.
Who, exactly, is the FDA protecting again?

"...half of all heart attacks occur in people with normal or low cholesterol, so doctors have been testing other ways to predict who is at risk."

What does this say about the high-cholesterol causation-hypothesis of heart disease? If fully half of all heart attack victims do not have elevated cholesterol levels, why do doctors want to lower those levels in EVERYBODY? This is about selling drugs, not health nor genuine prevention.

"The study was supposed to last five years but was stopped in March, after about two years, when independent monitors saw that those taking Crestor were faring better than the others."

Hmmm. It is convenient that they stopped the study prior to a preponderance of negative side-effects associated with prolonged reliance on statin drugs. I wrote earlier about the "forgetfulness" of those who are stalwart defenders of "statins as panacea." One of the most significant consequences of global stain use will be collective amnesia in the form of an Alzheimer's epidemic this world has never seen.

By irresponsibly reducing cholesterol in millions of people worldwide, they are robbing an essential "fat" from the brain and nervous system that is critical for cellular communication. Welcome to planet...er, what planet is this?

The reason that anyone can claim an improvement in health from the use of Crestor (or any in the statin category) is because of its anti-inflammatory effect. However, this benefit is short-lived as its negative impact on the body is soon revealed via liver/kidney toxicity and rhabdomyolysis (muscle wasting). The Alzheimer's? Forget about it, they already have.

Safe, natural options? Well, they're not "FDA-approved," but for your consideration, you might give these supplements a go: Cod liver oil, GTF Chromium, Selenium, Magnesium, Hawthorn Berry, homeopathic Crataegus, Can-Gest, Silica, Probiotics12+ and Folate B6 & B12 (if you are concerned about homocystine levels)...

Why would you rely upon a synthetic substance approved by the bureaucratic oligarchy for anything related to your health? I wouldn't even brush my teeth with Crestor. I wonder, though, will Keith Olberman declare it safe as long as "government" pays for it? Or will he claim that Barack Obama can turn statin-laced tap water into statin-laced whine?

Nancy Reagan, where are you? Just say no...to Crestor.


Created with Admarket's flickrSLiDR.