Dangerous Medical Mediocrity or Courageous Doctors Teaching You How to Heal Yourself

Disclosing Drug Makers Payments to Doctors Gets Boost "Lawmakers gained Eli Lilly's support after they agreed to raise the payment limit requiring disclosure from $25 to $500." Conflicts of interest can be the death of you.

In a free society, doctors would be able to prescribe nutritional solutions to what ails you without fear of repercussions from state medical boards. That's where the real conflict of interest resides. Medical trade associations lobby the government to form boards that would theoretically protect the public from "bad" doctors, but in actuality, they protect the "bad" doctors from the consequences of their pharmaceutical prescribing.

If the public ever awoke to find out how modern medicine, through the brute force of government, limited "healing" to only that which is pharmaceutical and toxic, medical board members would have to run for their lives. Pitchforks and torches would be too kind. The concept of "an eye for an eye" would require that board members undergo needless surgical procedures and be on at least ten different medications simultaneously.

It is not a necessity to insure the safety of Americans that a small group of unelected drug-lackeys control what is and is not "good" medicine. More often than not, they get it wrong by design. Why can't modern medicine operate in a free market where doctors and patients get to choose the care that is most appropriate? They can, but only if we have the stomach for liberty and the responsibility that goes along with it.

Allopathic medicine has degraded from a life-saving profession in times of unexpected catastrophes to a collectivist methodology that keeps the entire planet enslaved to toxic poisons no matter how minor the affliction. You want to know how to find a good doctor? Find one who has been attacked by a state medical board for using "unconventional" therapies. The courageous few who stick their thumb in the eye of cowardly bureaucrats should be rewarded for attempting to salvage what is best about the humble origins of the healing arts:

"Let your food be your medicine and let your medicine be your food."

When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When doctors fear the medical board, there is pharmaceutical tyranny. When there are no more medical boards, doctors and non-doctors alike will be free to help the people heal themselves, just as it was in the beginning.

The origin of the word "physician" has its roots in the word "teacher." A true doctor does not heal you, but teaches you how to heal yourself. If you cannot, then you will find yourself victimized by a ruling medical elite happy to keep you enslaved to a medical paradigm where there is no health care, only disease management. Couple that with a behemoth bureaucracy that grows larger with each successive administration, whether they be Democrat or Republican, and sadly, you must conclude that we love medical slavery more than we love health freedom.

Actually, it isn't that the slaves love to be slaves, it's just that they have been accustomed to being so by virtue of their birth into it. Therefore, even those trapped in the allopathic paradigm and miserable because of it, will sometimes lash out at those who point out their pathetic state. Don't worry, the politicians who benefit from your continued dependency will promise to improve your lot in life by giving you a bit more from that which they can steal from your neighbor. Should a politician show up and point out the fact that you are actually NOT free in that relationship, the political pundits in the media will lash out at him in order to keep you feeling good about being "less than free."

This is what has happened with the good doctor Ron Paul. He has been "caught" pointing out that the emperor wears no clothes. The "Ron Paul Revolution" is nothing more than "slaves" waking up to their imprisoned reality and acting as if they want to be free of relationships that do not support the goals of liberty.

"How dare they!"

Indeed. How outrageous it is that there exists a small band of Americans audacious enough to take the words of The Constitution and Declaration of Independence seriously. I say thank goodness that some of us (doctors included) still have the courage to stand up for liberty, especially in a time where the majority of Americans believe that their "rights" come from government.

Nutritionally-deficient Americans have been convinced that a government purchased by "drugged" interests is the only hope for what ails America (see Clinton, Obama, McCain). Conflicts of interest come in all shapes and colors, and the worst come under the "color" of law. Our founding documents grant the government no right to limit the healing choices we have and make.

That they do is not the government's fault; it is ours.

Parents may be jailed over vaccinations "Nobody has the right to unfettered liberty, and people do not have a right to endanger their kids," said John Harris, a professor of bioethics at the University of Manchester.

The question "who owns you?" has been solved in Belgium where clearly, the government owns your body and can tell you what to do with it. The power of pharmacological enslavement in the hands of government is a dangerous thing. The Right to Life, Liberty and Property is not enjoyed by citizens of many countries on this planet, perhaps even our own, as evidenced by the lack of biological autonomy in the selection and use of alternative medicines. Why doesn't Bush invade Belgium to restore property rights there? I suppose waffles are not as valuable as petrochemicals.

Do you have a RIGHT to refuse medical intervention of the vaccination kind? Normally in the U.S., the answer is yes. Last year, however, some "bio-terror and pandemic" emergency legislation passed which would make it a crime to refuse shots and anti-viral drugs. At the very least, you may be subject to house arrest for refusing pharmaceutical influence. If it elevates, you could be subject to quarantine in a government camp for vaccination refusniks.

How Americans have lost their love of liberty that they would allow government to disregard inalienable rights in this way is no mystery to me. All that had to be done was institute free "mandatory" government education (public schools) and replace nutrition with drugs. It would only be a matter of time before we would beg to be taken care of by government. How else would you explain the fanatical support for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama? And what of the warfare state in perpetuity guaranteed by McCain? A nutritionally sound populace has no need for welfare or warfare. War is the health of the state and evidence of the disease of the people. You can kill the microbes (bloody revolution) or make them go on a starvation fast (peaceful revolution). More importantly, you can support the one man still running for president that understands the true cause of our national disease and its appropriate cure (read: the Constitution), known currently as The Ron Paul rEVOLution.

A Word From Ron Paul "Reclaiming our historic legacy of principled commitment to liberty will, once again, unleash the innovative spirit that propelled our nation to heights of prosperity never before achieved in human history." Why are the majority of Democrats and Republicans afraid of freedom? Because they are in lust with power. They can't have people running around this country actually believing that they are free! Why, the people might actually get the idea that they do not need McCain, Hillary or Barack running their lives. Vast swaths of the Republicrat party are elitist yoyos who would not know what to do with their own lives if the people ever woke up and told them to shove it. Seriously, what would they do if they were not in government? Hillary would serve on the board of Wal-Mart insuring the transfer of your depreciating dollars to China in exchange for plastic and questionable dog-food. McCain would be lost in perpetual anger management courses mandated by court order. Obama could go back to teaching about the Constitution, something I question whether he really understands. Then we could have the good doctor Ron Paul come in and teach the nation about constitutionally protected freedoms, and getting the government out of the way, so that we all may once again exert our birthright in liberty. It may be that the "majority" do not want to be free, but since this is not a democracy, you are not free to enslave the minority who cherish their liberty. The cowards supporting the perpetual welfare/warfare state may claim they want to help people or make the world safe for a form of government that we do not even have (nor want), but they are actually contributing to their own demise. The freedom for which so many yearn comes from our divinity, being created in the likeness of the Creator. These united States of America are a grand experiment to see if we can handle the freedom bestowed upon us. It is obvious to me that the three remaining "major" candidates for president can't handle freedom, or else they would be doing their level best to dismantle the main obstacle to self-determination - a government that has far exceeded its constitutional bounds. May we have time to restore it before our children and theirs suffer under "democratic" tyranny. The Ron Paul Revolution was never really about Ron Paul -- but about the restoration of our constitutional republic, so that all Americans would be secure in the RIGHTS to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.