Homeopathic Attacks: Zicam provides food for anti-freedom FDA bureaucratic oligarchy supporters

Headline: Zicam not alone in side effect reports as the MSM goes after homeopathy "Very often, the only active ingredient is alcohol, and patients don't know that, and they get a buzz-on. The therapeutic effect is no greater or less than a martini," says Dr. Jerry Avorn, an expert in pharmaceutical safety at Harvard Medical School. If Dr. Avorn seriously believes that people are buying homeopathic remedies and getting an alcohol buzz on ten drops, Harvard should demand that he return his degree.

Following is taken from a lengthy AP homeopathic "attack" article three days ago (my comments follow in blue):

• "Active homeopathic ingredients are typically diluted down to 1 part per million or less, but some are present in much higher concentrations. The active ingredient in Zicam is 2 parts per 100."

Wrong. The allopathically-corrupted mainstream media does not even know what a 2x is. 1 part per 100. If they got something so basic and simple wrong, you can be sure that they screwed up elsewhere in their reporting on homeopathy.

• "The FDA has set strict limits for alcohol in medicine, especially for small children, but they don't apply to homeopathic remedies. The American Academy of Pediatrics has said no medicine should carry more than 5 percent alcohol. The FDA has acknowledged that some homeopathic syrups far surpass 10 percent alcohol."

Instead of toxic, synthetic preservatives, alcohol has been used to retard bacterial contamination for over 200 years. Considering that dosage size is typically only a few drops, the idiots in the MSM ignore the fact that even a child's body produces more alcohol endogenously during the Krebs cycle of digestion than they would get from a homeopathic medicine.

• The National Institutes of Health's alternative medicine center spent $3.8 million on homeopathic research from 2002 to 2007 but is now abandoning studies on homeopathic drugs. "The evidence is not there at this point," says the center's director, Dr. Josephine Briggs.

Homeopathic medicine is a system that depends upon individualization of treatment and thus is at a great disadvantage when measured by standardize, one-size-fits-all placebo-controlled studies. Even so, there have been numerous published studies showing efficacy of homeopathic medicines, conveniently ignored in this toxic assault on health freedom.

• "At least 20 ingredients used in conventional prescription drugs, like digitalis for heart trouble and morphine for pain, are also used in homeopathic remedies. Other homeopathic medicines are derived from cancerous or other diseased tissues. Many are formulated from powerful poisons like strychnine, arsenic or snake venom."

Where did the drug companies learn about the medicines that they have synthesized and made so toxic as to become the #3 leading cause of death in America? From harmless homeopathic medicines and their centuries old materia medica and pharmacopoeia.

• "Homeopathy sprang from the inventive — some would say fanciful — mind of German physician and chemist Samuel Hahnemann in the late 1700s."

Notice how they throw in a completely unscientific adjective to relegate homeopathy's origins to fairy land. Blinded studies were first conducted by homeopaths. The placebo effect was first identified and coined by homeopaths. If anybody is in fairyland, it is the allopathic doctors who believe they can heal disease by adding measurable quantities of toxic poisons to the body.

• To this day, homeopaths put forth mystical-sounding explanations involving "vital force" and "healing energy." And with arcane ingredients like "nux vomica" and "arsenicum album," many homeopathic medicines sound like something brewed in a druid's kettle.

Here, the MSM attacks homeopathic medicine solely on the basis of designating its ingredients in Latin, a practice used worldwide so that all pharmacists can identify the medicines accurately. The basis for classification of genus and species wall over the globe is in Latin. Vital force and healing energy might sound mystical to scientists rooted in toxic substances, but anybody with adrenal exhaustion knows what a lack of those two things feels like.

• In 1938, Congress passed a law granting homeopathic remedies the same legal status as regular pharmaceuticals. The law's principal author was Sen. Royal Copeland of New York, a trained homeopath. "He did it in such a sneaky way that nobody really noticed or paid attention," says medical author Natalie Robins.

Sneaky? EVERYTHING Congress does is sneaky. It is only painted that way by allopathic apologists if Congress passes something for which they do not approve or like. Why is the MSM ramping up its attack on homeopathic medicine? See below.

"...the U.S. homeopathic remedy market exploded by 89 percent to an estimated $830 million last year, homeopathic remedies were taken by almost 4 million Americans, or 2 percent of adults, federal data show."

• Pharmacist Albert Lavender, retired deputy director of the FDA's unit overseeing drug labels, calls it "a big fraud" on the consumer. "He might not get hurt most of the time, but his pocketbook is getting hurt all of the time," he says. He says "it doesn't make sense" that the FDA requires homeopathic medicine to bear a label saying what it treats because, in his view, most of it treats nothing."

Is it fraud if a free American buys a homeopathic medicine and is satisfied with the result? Or is it fraud just because narrow-minded allopathically-trained, pharmaceutically-conflicted pharmacists declare it so? Is your pocketbook hammered more when you spend a few bucks on homeopathic pellets or hundreds of dollars on toxic drugs that may or may not work? Do you believe in freedom or allopathic medical tyranny?

EPA: Drugs in the Water Must Mean We Need More Drugs to Clean Up This Economic Mess

Headline: World's highest drug levels entering India stream "Enough of a single, powerful antibiotic was being spewed into one stream each day to treat every person in a city of 90,000." Is this the new socialized medicine? No need to go to your doctor and pharmacy, just bathe in the stream.

Somehow, I do not think that is what Hillary meant by "universal" health care, but it's just as destructive. Enslaving the planet to pharmaceuticals is the inevitable result of the phony free market (monopoly medicine) and/or overt socialism (government-mandated health insurance for all).

One problem is the lack of understanding as to the true cause of disease. Disease does not result from a pharmaceutical drug-deficiency. Breast cancer is not due to a shortage of mammograms. Yet all proposed solutions, whether they be faux free market, or leftist paternalism, focus on allopathic drugs and licensed allopathic practitioners to the exclusion of that which is true prevention and health correction.

The business of disease is still disease, whether there be 250,000,000 payers or a single payer. As long as the government grants a monopoly to Big PHARMA and its representatives, the system does not change, and true health suffers, while the cancerous bureaucratic oligarchy metastasizes.

Your freedom to heal is only impeded by government interfering in a true free market. A real free market (not the illusory one we have been operating under for many decades) would include all healers and healing modalities competing on a level playing field. Where there is true competition, services become more efficient and more affordable.

News alert: Allopathic medicine does not have to compete with any healthcare system other than itself, so it has become grossly inefficient and extraordinarily expensive. At the same time, government involvement has stifled innovation, so that true breakthroughs in prevention and treatment are suppressed or banned. This may keep Big PHARMA's cash registers humming, but it keeps diseased people ever more diseased.

So, how is it that the world's waterways are becoming the circulatory system of the patented, synthetic substances of the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex? If it is not by outright dumping, then it is simply a function of the human and animal bladder.

"Last year, The Associated Press reported that trace concentrations of pharmaceuticals had been found in drinking water provided to at least 46 million Americans."

Trace concentrations may not sound like much, but when you realize that life happens in trace concentrations, perhaps you will see the real failure of EPA and environmental organizations in "protecting" the public. Just like the rest of the unconstitutional rule-making bodies in Washington, D.C., they end up protecting industry over you and me.

Case in point: Why are environmental groups petitioning EPA to ban colloidal silver as a dangerous pesticide when nano-silver particles have existed naturally in streams all over planet earth since earth became a planet? At the same time, the REAL toxins (FDA-approved drugs) are causing asexual and hermaphrodite amphibians to pop up where there used to be none, while increasing infertility in higher mammals as well. Now we get word that trace amounts of other manmade chemicals are delaying pregnancies and increasing rates of miscarriage.

You want regulation? The regulators you may crave are actually complicit in this nefarious plot to flood planet earth in the chemical soup of Pfizer and Monsanto, just to name two of the many multinational chemical conglomerates. It is not just in "environmental" welfare where regulators are screwing up the natural order.

It is much the same with the current economy. Government regulations and mutant regulators are facilitating the demise of the economy and (eventually) the dollar along with it by carpeting planet earth with fiat Federal Reserve Note "dollars." Can you say "currency crash"?

Does anyone see a common theme running through this call for more government intervention to save us from that which government makes inevitable?

If the EPA does to the environment what the Fed is doing to the economy, its minions will claim that only more drugs in the water can clean up the problem we have with too many drugs in the water. I wish I were kidding.

National Kidney Foundation Slows Contribution to Kidney Disease, Halts Support of Fluoride

Headline: Lawsuits threatened over forced fluoride "Concerns about fluoridation are quickly surfacing as the National Kidney Foundation withdrew its support of the chemical additive..."

Is it really "quickly" when it's taken DECADES to acknowledge that mass-drugging of the population might not be a medically responsible practice? Do you like the idea of increasing the uptake of heavy metals in your body? As if any of us needed more.

"Fluoride in the water and mercury in their mouths" is one medically plausible reason as to the irrational and unconstitutional behavior endemic to Washington. D.C. and those that feed off it like parasites. There is growing awareness, however, as the recent reversals regarding the belief in the safety of mercury and fluoride by government regulators and private trade groups show. Perhaps the Fluoride Action Network is having an impact after all. Hats off to Dr. Paul Connett and his 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation.

It should be embarrassing for anyone with a Duh-gree to defend the mass drugging of the population with a neuro-toxic waste product (from aluminum mining, processing and other sources). If government bureaucrats finally agree to remove the fluoride, will they argue to replace it with statin drugs and SSRI's instead? Only medical collectivists could argue that it is for the "greater good" to drug EVERYBODY so that some people will not get "sick." All the while, the sickness is caused by the substance put in the water to prevent it.

One-size-fits-all prescribing is the hallmark of allopathic medicine. Impressive? This type of thinking results in hundreds of thousands of needless deaths every year. Although correcting this deranged thought form is better late than never, how many kidneys were destroyed prior to the National Kidney Foundation's withdrawal of support?

The fluoride dam is breaking. Hallelujah. Watch everyone's IQ rise accordingly. Of course, that would make the American Dental Association and American Medical Association look all the more foolish. What is the definition of justice?

Dangerous Medical Mediocrity or Courageous Doctors Teaching You How to Heal Yourself

Disclosing Drug Makers Payments to Doctors Gets Boost "Lawmakers gained Eli Lilly's support after they agreed to raise the payment limit requiring disclosure from $25 to $500." Conflicts of interest can be the death of you.

In a free society, doctors would be able to prescribe nutritional solutions to what ails you without fear of repercussions from state medical boards. That's where the real conflict of interest resides. Medical trade associations lobby the government to form boards that would theoretically protect the public from "bad" doctors, but in actuality, they protect the "bad" doctors from the consequences of their pharmaceutical prescribing.

If the public ever awoke to find out how modern medicine, through the brute force of government, limited "healing" to only that which is pharmaceutical and toxic, medical board members would have to run for their lives. Pitchforks and torches would be too kind. The concept of "an eye for an eye" would require that board members undergo needless surgical procedures and be on at least ten different medications simultaneously.

It is not a necessity to insure the safety of Americans that a small group of unelected drug-lackeys control what is and is not "good" medicine. More often than not, they get it wrong by design. Why can't modern medicine operate in a free market where doctors and patients get to choose the care that is most appropriate? They can, but only if we have the stomach for liberty and the responsibility that goes along with it.

Allopathic medicine has degraded from a life-saving profession in times of unexpected catastrophes to a collectivist methodology that keeps the entire planet enslaved to toxic poisons no matter how minor the affliction. You want to know how to find a good doctor? Find one who has been attacked by a state medical board for using "unconventional" therapies. The courageous few who stick their thumb in the eye of cowardly bureaucrats should be rewarded for attempting to salvage what is best about the humble origins of the healing arts:

"Let your food be your medicine and let your medicine be your food."

When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When doctors fear the medical board, there is pharmaceutical tyranny. When there are no more medical boards, doctors and non-doctors alike will be free to help the people heal themselves, just as it was in the beginning.

The origin of the word "physician" has its roots in the word "teacher." A true doctor does not heal you, but teaches you how to heal yourself. If you cannot, then you will find yourself victimized by a ruling medical elite happy to keep you enslaved to a medical paradigm where there is no health care, only disease management. Couple that with a behemoth bureaucracy that grows larger with each successive administration, whether they be Democrat or Republican, and sadly, you must conclude that we love medical slavery more than we love health freedom.

Actually, it isn't that the slaves love to be slaves, it's just that they have been accustomed to being so by virtue of their birth into it. Therefore, even those trapped in the allopathic paradigm and miserable because of it, will sometimes lash out at those who point out their pathetic state. Don't worry, the politicians who benefit from your continued dependency will promise to improve your lot in life by giving you a bit more from that which they can steal from your neighbor. Should a politician show up and point out the fact that you are actually NOT free in that relationship, the political pundits in the media will lash out at him in order to keep you feeling good about being "less than free."

This is what has happened with the good doctor Ron Paul. He has been "caught" pointing out that the emperor wears no clothes. The "Ron Paul Revolution" is nothing more than "slaves" waking up to their imprisoned reality and acting as if they want to be free of relationships that do not support the goals of liberty.

"How dare they!"

Indeed. How outrageous it is that there exists a small band of Americans audacious enough to take the words of The Constitution and Declaration of Independence seriously. I say thank goodness that some of us (doctors included) still have the courage to stand up for liberty, especially in a time where the majority of Americans believe that their "rights" come from government.

Nutritionally-deficient Americans have been convinced that a government purchased by "drugged" interests is the only hope for what ails America (see Clinton, Obama, McCain). Conflicts of interest come in all shapes and colors, and the worst come under the "color" of law. Our founding documents grant the government no right to limit the healing choices we have and make.

That they do is not the government's fault; it is ours.