The most potent 3 hours of AIDS Rethinking ever on Talk Radio

SUBJECT: Media Alert: Sunday April 19, 2009 1-4 PM EDT: Pre-empting the 25th Anniversary of the "probable cause of AIDS" Press Conference Only on the Robert Scott Bell Show

Sunday April 19 from 1-3 PM EDT (bonus podcast to follow)

Tune in to the Robert Scott Bell Show on Sunday, April 19, 2009, from 1 to 4 PM Eastern as we pre-empt the 25th anniversary of the infamous April 23, 1984 Gallo-Heckler "probable cause of AIDS" press conference with sane voices of reasoned, scientific discourse about HIV/AIDS.

Topics of discussion will include:

* The unanswered letter to Science by 37 scientists, doctors, legal professionals, and others calling for the retraction of the original four papers that served as the scientific basis for the claims made in the press conference on the grounds that they have been shown to be fraudulent.

* The Nobel Prize Award in Physiology or Medicine 2008 to co-recipients Dr. Luc Montagnier and Dr. Françoise Barré-Sinnousi for their discovery of 'HIV' (the suppose cause of AIDS) despite Montagnier admitting in an interview that they did not purify the virus and repeatedly stating over the years that HIV was not sufficient to cause AIDS by itself.

* The Rethinking AIDS 2009 Conference in Oakland California from November 6-8 where you will meet some of the show's guests and many others looking for a balanced perspective on HIV/AIDS.

* ...evidence in the long-running investigation into the use of toxic drugs on orphans in New York City in the Incarnation Children’s Center orphanage and in New York’s major hospitals, and then in Aids medicine in general. And many more!

Scheduled guests include Professor Peter Duesberg, journalist Liam Scheff, protease inhibitor drug expert Dr. David Rasnick, AIDS in Africa expert Dr. Charles Geshekter, scientist and talk show host Dr. Jonas Moses, Rethinking AIDS and Alberta Reappraising AIDS Society President David Crowe, Rethinking AIDS Media Coordinator and talk show host Jason Erb.

Will the most eminent retrovirologist, Dr. Peter Duesberg, who in 1987 risked his career by daring to question HIV/AIDS theory join as well? Tune in to find out!

You can listen to the live stream from the link at http://robertscottbell.blogspot.com/ during the show or from one of the 75 radio affiliates listed at the 'Affiliates' link.

If you miss it live, the podcast will be available the following day at http://robertscottbell.blogspot.com/ as well as past appearances by some of the day's guests.

For information about Rethinking AIDS and how to get involved along with 2600+ other Rethinkers, please visit http://rethinkingaids.com.

We now offer various thank-you gifts for U.S. tax-deductible charitable donations, including documentaries and signed copies of books by AIDS Rethinkers. Visit http://rethinkingaids.com/DonatetoRA/tabid/141/Default.aspx for details.

Hope for Ch-ch-change with Health Care Under Obama

This past weekend a lengthy AP news story reported, “the myth has long been that the U.S. had the best health care system in the world, but statistics and an increase in medical tourism show that’s not the case,” citing Tom Daschle as their source.

Daschle is slated to be Secretary of Health & Human Services under President Obama. Formerly he was a U.S. Senator for South Dakota and also Senate Majority Leader.

More than a year ago this column reported on America falling out of the top 40 for both infant mortality and total length of life. At the beginning and end of life America is failing – and it is the same in so many places in between when it comes to health care.

This columnist has been sounding this alarm for many years.

Nice to see top government officials finally catching up.

Daschle wants to address this by “giving people the chance to highlight their concerns and experiences” by having “people around the nation to hold what amounts to house parties from Dec. 15-31” and “asking anybody and everybody to share their health care experiences.”

Help make a difference

This columnist has been contacted by John Podesta, Co-chair of the Obama-Biden Transition Project.

Please write to me at the mailing address or e-mail noted at the end of this column all your health care experiences with whole food nutrition supplements, herbs and dietary changes resulting in medications reduced or eliminated.

Detail your dramatic blood sugar improvement, increased good HDL cholesterol levels, and decreased bad LDL cholesterol as well as total cholesterol levels with 100 per cent whole food GTF chromium and selenium supplements.

Highlight elimination of knee, hip and other joint pains as well as back pain and restoration of function with 100 per cent vegetal silica supplements.

Share your successes eliminating acid reflux with use of CanGest herbal tea.

Some of you have had failing kidneys restored and been removed from transplant lists. Send your success stories so that others may benefit.

So very many of you have spoken to me in person or by phone of results that others would call miracles. Please document these experiences and send them to me.

Your letters and e-mails will be forwarded to the Obama-Biden Transition team after the end of this month. Responses will be sent anonymously unless you specifically request for your name to be passed along.


Stop the lies and fraud

Just prior to press deadline a formal request was made to the journal Science for removal of four foundational articles on HIV and AIDS due to new evidence of fraud. The request is signed by signatories including medical doctors, chemists, oncologists, university professors, virologists, researchers, pathologists and biologists.

Documentation has been discovered that shows researcher Matthew Gonda, Ph.D. informed Dr. Robert Gallo that electron microscopy showed no evidence of a virus. Gallo subsequently used Gonda’s name and photographs to subsequently falsify data and declare that a virus – HIV – had been isolated that caused AIDS.

The formal request to Science was also endorsed by the Semmelweis Society International Inc. comprised of physicians, nurses, attorneys and university professors with a stated primary mission to promote patient safety by ending retaliation against scientists, physicians, and nurses who report dangerous conditions, fraud, and corruption within hospitals and the US health care industry.

Extensive details on this dramatic turn of events may be found at http://robertscottbell.blogspot.com/2008/12/top-scientists-ask-medical-journal.html, the blog of nationally syndicated radio broadcaster Robert Scott Bell of Talk Radio Network.

The formal request was made one day prior to scheduled awarding of a Nobel Prize for the alleged discovery of HIV as cause of AIDS.

One member of the Nobel Prize Committee has written that this particular prize was awarded to silence dissent.

Whereas in times past religion impeded scientific truth to protect the dogma of the prevailing belief system contradicted by science it is now scientific dogma that impedes scientific truth because it does not square up with the prevailing belief system.

Modern science has become faith based in spite of the facts.

Help the sorting of fact by sending your documented health care experiences today.

Christopher C. Barr writes Naturally Speaking from Arkansas: The Natural State … naturally! You may write him at Post Office Box 1147, Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455 or by e-mail at servantofYHVH@hotmail.com.

Semmelweis Endorses Scientists’ Call for Science to RETRACT Fraudulent Reports on HIV

Washington DC, Dec 9 – Nearly 25 years after the publication of four foundational articles on HIV and AIDS, prominent scientists, physicians and legal experts are now asking for their removal from the journal Science.

Their request is based upon new evidence that Dr. Robert Gallo - the former National Cancer Institute (NCI) researcher who declared he had found the probable cause of AIDS - had actually based his claims on his own unverified last-minute alterations to lab reports and experiments.

The letter’s 37 signatories include medical doctors, chemists, oncologists, university professors, virologists, researchers, pathologists, AND biologists.

After fellow researcher Matthew Gonda PhD informed Gallo that his electron microscopy showed no evidence of a virus in 1984, Gallo used Gonda’s name and photographs to corroborate his claim that he had isolated the virus. Because the majority of all subsequent AIDS research is predicated on the assumption that Gallo’s research was legitimate, the ramification of these findings of fraud raises serious questions regarding past and current US policy toward AIDS research.

It now appears that Gallo never produced any evidence or proof that HIV attacks cells or causes AIDS. As a result of his unchallenged claims, Gallo was officially declared one of two co-discoverers of the HIV in 1984.

Gallo left NCI after the Dept’s of Health’s Office of Research Integrity (ORI) accused him of committing scientific misconduct (1992). Although the evidence against him was considerable a legal technicality prevented criminal charges from being filed.

Gallo shares a patent for HIV tests that generates millions of dollars in annual revenue, although the tests do not detect the presence of the virus itself or any unique or specific components of HIV. No HIV test manufacturer has ever claimed that their tests detect HIV or AIDS.

The new findings were first admitted into evidence during a Congressional investigation (Dingell-1993) that focused on questions related to Gallo’s alleged theft of cell culture samples. Those hearings never examined the actual fabrication of research.

The ORI reported that Gallo’s “irresponsible laboratory management has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken.” Not only did Gallo’s conduct prevent fellow scientists from verifying his research, but Gallo distributed research materials with the express stipulation that his experiments not be repeated.

Semmelweis Society International (SSI) has determined that the new evidence does not conflict with the findings of its own investigation, which was initiated after a former medical student raised questions about AIDS in Africa.

For additional information, contact Clark Baker (clark@semmelweis.org) or visit www.semmelweis.org.

(Semmelweis Society International, Inc., is a registered 501c3 non-profit corporation. Comprised of physicians, nurses, attorneys and university professors, its primary mission is to promote patient safety by ending retaliation against scientists, physicians, and nurses who report dangerous conditions, fraud, and corruption within hospitals and the US healthcare industry.)

Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers

SAN FRANCISCO (Rethinking AIDS) Dec. 9, 2008--The international nonprofit scientific organization Rethinking AIDS gave its full support today to 37 senior researchers, medical doctors and legal professionals who are requesting that the medical journal Science withdraw four seminal papers on HIV authored by Dr. Robert Gallo--papers widely touted as proof that HIV is the "probable cause of AIDS." An online posting of the letter can be found here [http://rethinkingaids.com/Content/QA/tabid/146/Default.aspx].

"With new findings that undermine the scientific integrity and veracity of Gallo's four papers, the entire basis of the theory that HIV causes AIDS may now be questioned," says Rethinking AIDS president David Crowe.

The letter to the journal comes at a time when the microbiology world is abuzz about Gallo's omission from the 2008 Nobel Prize in medicine for the discovery of HIV, contrary to an international agreement that the two teams should share credit. French scientists Drs. Luc Montagnier and Francoise Barré-Sinoussi are instead to be given the award, a decision that also implicitly questions the scientific integrity of Gallo's claim of the discovery. Montagnier, however, admitted on camera [http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/dtinterviewlm.htm] more than a decade ago that his experiments did not purify any virus.

The four papers were originally published on May 4, 1984, a few days after a press conference by Gallo announcing he had discovered the "probable cause of AIDS." Now, a British investigative journalist has shown that Gallo's claim was based on last-minute alterations to documents that make false claims about the results of his lab work and research experiments. The letter to Science sent by the 37 experts on Monday, Dec. 1, 2008, includes a copy of Gallo's handwritten changes to the article, a letter from an electron microscopy expert indicating that Gallo's samples did not contain any virus, and a letter from Gallo to a researcher verifying that HIV could not be purified directly from human materials.

The investigative conclusion prompting the letter to Science was made by journalist Janine Roberts, author of Fear of the Invisible, a book that examines the origin of several disease theories. "I was shocked when I read the original draft of the key scientific paper now widely cited as proving HIV causes AIDS," says Roberts. "Gallo's handwritten last-minute changes had reversed what the scientists in his lab had originally concluded. This demonstrates a stunning disregard for the scientific process and a very disturbing breach of public trust."

It is clear that the seminal research published on HIV contained unjustified claims and alterations. In 1993, governmental investigators determined Gallo had so poorly recorded his key and much-cited experiment that it was impossible to repeat and verify it.

In the early 1990s, several highly critical reports on the research underlying Gallo's papers were produced as a result of governmental inquiries working under the supervision of scientists nominated by the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine. The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper of the four was "fraught with false and erroneous statements" and that the "ORI believes that the careless and unacceptable keeping of research records . . . reflects irresponsible laboratory management that has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken." Further, a Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations produced a staff report on the papers, containing scathing criticisms of their integrity.

Rethinking AIDS [www.rethinkingaids.com]- an international group of more than 2,600 scientists, doctors, journalists, health advocates and others - offers several eminent medical and scientific experts to comment on this and other AIDS issues currently in the news:

Etienne de Harven, M.D.* Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto Saint Cézaire, France Member and professor in cell biology, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, 1956-1981. Isolated and obtained the first electron microscopic studies of the murine Friend leukemia virus, and retroviral budding. Frequent critic of the "isolation" of HIV, and past president of Rethinking AIDS. Dr. de Harven can comment on the science of retrovirus isolation.

Janine Roberts Investigative Reporter Bristol, U.K. jan@fearoftheinvisible.com Author, Fear of the Invisible, a recent book exposing the fraud in the drafting of one of the original 1984 Science articles by Robert Gallo. Web site: www.fearoftheinvisible.com

Media Contacts:

David Crowe* President, Rethinking AIDS Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Mountain time zone) 1-403-289-6609 (office) 1-403-861-2225 (mobile) david.crowe@aras.ab.ca

Elizabeth Ely Public Relations Chairperson Rethinking AIDS Brooklyn, N.Y., U.S. (Eastern time zone) 1-718-704-9672 (mobile) publicrelations@rethinkingaids.com

*Rethinking AIDS board member.

Rethinking AIDS: The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis ("RA" or "the Group") was formed in 1991 to express the concerns of a growing number of renowned scientists and medical doctors about HIV research and the resulting human rights abuses. In 1995, by a letter published in Science, the Group called for a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against the HIV/AIDS hypothesis and recommended that critical epidemiological studies be undertaken.

Among RA's founders and key members are University of Toronto professor emeritus and former cancer researcher Dr. Etienne de Harven; Harvard microbiologist Dr. Charles Thomas; 1993 Nobel laureate for chemistry Dr. Kary Mullis; Nature/Biotechnology co-founder Dr. Harvey Bialy; University of California at Berkeley molecular biologist Dr. Peter Duesberg and the late Yale mathematician Dr. Serge Lang, both members of the National Academy of Sciences; physicist Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos of the Royal Perth Hospital in Australia; and Glasgow University professor emeritus of public health and World Health Organization consultant Dr. Gordon Stewart.

World AIDS Treatment Day 2008 Interruptus: An Uncensored Link to Podcasts

World AIDS Treatment Day 2008 Bonus Podcast Please join us for this spontaneous conversation on all that is related to HIV and AIDS, particularly that which the mainstream media never allows to be spoken. Robert Scott Bell moderates this fascinating conversation between some of the most courageous individuals from journalism, science, activism, law and parenthood. This bonus podcast serves to "pre-empt" the pharmaceutically funded World AIDS Day 2008 with an uncensored discussion of HIV tests, HAART therapy, denialism, politics, economics, hope for the future and more, all without commercial interruption. My guests include Henry Bauer, PhD (author of The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory), Christine Maggiore (author of What If Everything You Thought You Knew about AIDS Was Wrong?, howpositiveareyou.com, aliveandwell.org), David Rasnick, PhD (author of "Germ of Lies"), Celia Farber (author of Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS), Clark Baker (Gallo's Egg), and David Crowe (RethinkingAIDS.com).

Bonus Podcast: http://www.switchpod.com/f99232.html?puser=none

World AIDS Treatment Day - 11/30/2008 - Podcast Hour 1 -- We interrupt the pharmaceutical-lovefest to bring you "World AIDS Treatment Day 2008" in order that we may pre-empt the pharmaceutical money machine that funds World AIDS Day. It is long past time to get over the wrong-headed concept that AIDS can be countered by drugs too toxic for healthy people to use.

Now that the world knows that Gallo's 1984 "Popovic et al" paper does NOT prove that HIV causes AIDS, when will SCIENCE withdraw the original four papers on which this immune deficiency syndrome falsely rests?

I have an all-star cast joining me in reversing the ignorance and arrogance of those who believe that HIV causes immune deficiency. Please welcome returning guests Professor Peter Duesberg, Celia Farber, David Rasnick, and first time guest David Crowe of Rethinking AIDS.

We only have to overcome billions of dollars in pharmaceutical funding and a collective global consciousness marketed into believing that HIV is an immortal super villain. No problem.

Hour 1: http://www.switchpod.com/f99219.html?puser=none

Ending Cognitive Dissonance on AIDS with Nutritional Intelligence - 11/30/2008 - Hour 2 -- Are there people living long and healthy lives even after testing "positive" to non-specific (HIV) antibody tests? Yes, as long as they avoid "Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy" (HAART).

The answer may shock you but it is a resounding "yes" in people who have rejected pharmaceutical toxins in favor of good nutrition. Despite the media claim that people are living longer on HAART, there is actually an "...increased incidence of cancer...only among those individuals who are receiving HAART."

It's time to let go of the cognitive dissonance and see the truth. Immune deficiency is real. "HIV causing it" is not.

What does this mean? It means that the power to heal is yours, as it has always been.

This week we include all the things that CDC, WHO and the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex do not want you to know about immune deficiency and what to do about it, with special guests David Crowe, Henry Bauer, PhD (author of The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory), Christine Maggiore (author of What If Everything You Thought You Knew about AIDS Was Wrong?), Clark Baker (Gallo's Egg) and more.

Recently, the media reported HIV will be eradicated in another ten years (and billions more dollars). We will have eradicated it in two hours with not one penny of Taxpayer funds -- and that's not Gallo's humor...

Empowering the nation and everyone in it to heal, only on the united States of health talk radio.

Hour 2: http://www.switchpod.com/f99217.html?puser=none

Gallo's Egg Continues To Crack as the Truth About AIDS Hatches

Headline: "Elite" HIV wife may hold secret to AIDS vaccine "Infected at least 10 years ago by her husband, the woman is able somehow to naturally control the deadly and incurable virus..." Did it ever occur to doctors that maybe she is just plain healthy? I find it rather interesting that these so-called non-progressors are called elitists.

She is a so-called "elite suppressor..."

It's an ironic description made by member scientists of a well-funded religion that demands worship of a retrovirus called HIV. The only actual "suppressing" going on is the suppression of the truth about AIDS. HIV does not cause it. The description of people testing "positive" to HIV, but not succumbing with immune collapse, as "suppressors" also brings to light the wrong-headed assumption that healthy people suppress disease in order to get or stay well. Is this how healthy people really stay healthy?

Perhaps in Louis Pasteur's childhood daydreams. Calling Antoine Béchamp. The truth is that when you are healthy, pathogens cannot breed and grow unchecked to result in a diagnosis of infection. Perhaps that is much too simple to understand for those that still believe that HIV tests actually detect HIV. Even the inventor of PCR (Nobel laureate Karry Mullis) stated that his breakthrough cannot be used as a diagnostic tool to detect the presence or absence of HIV.

Who pulled the pharmaceutical wool over planet earth? Even though it's a criminal enterprise, the pharmaceutical magic spell to cloud men's minds is wearing off as the wool is wearing thin. Truth is an unstoppable force, much like freedom, or love, it can be suppressed for a time, but it always breaks out somewhere else. What was it that the Terrence Mann character said in Field of Dreams?

"People will come, Ray."

It may look like an obscure Amish barn now, but the truth about HIV is getting a major upgrade thanks to Clark Baker and Gallo's Egg. The house that HIV built will crumble like the used toothpicks from which it was built. Or should I say that the house that HIV built will go down in the flames ignited by the AZT-laced matchsticks from which it was built? Either way, it will not be long before the world knows the criminal behavior of those that propped up the false causation hypothesis for money, status and power while hundreds of thousands went to pharmaceutical drug-induced deaths.

Anybody else fed up with the HIV death cult?

If you have not already done so, following are relevant audio archives on the topic of HIV, AIDS and Gallo's Egg:

New! I was interviewed by my good friend, Michael Badnarik, regarding Clark Baker's report: Mon., August 11, 2008: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )

Program #336 Cohost: Robert Scott Bell, my personal friend and syndicated talk show host. You can find Robert online at RSBell.com and RobertScottBell.Blogspot.com

HIV/AIDS Hoax Robert points us to a report called which suggests that the conclusion that HIV causes AIDS is seriously flawed. Clark Baker is an independent researcher who is investigating the criminal fraud behind the medial industry's insistence that pharmaceuticals are the only valid treatment.
References: Gallo's Egg Peter Duesberg Celia Farber RethinkingAids.com

Even more podcasts for download:

81525 The Clean Hands of Peter Duesberg & Celia Farber - 8/3/2008 - Hour 2

81337 Exclusive BONUS Off-Air Interview with Peter Duesberg and Celia Farber 08/03/2008

80174 The Robert Gallo HIV Egg is Cracking - 7/27/2008- Hour 2

80163 Exclusive Interview With Clark Baker and David Steel on HIV, AIDS and Gallo's Egg

76260 Exclusive Interview with Peter Duesberg - 5/25/2008

Older audio archives can be found here: http://rsbell.com/radio/

.

The Amazing Professor Duesberg Featured in Discover Magazine

Headline: AIDS "Dissident" Seeks Redemption... and a Cure for Cancer "On March 1, 1987, he published a paper in Cancer Research questioning the role of HIV in causing AIDS."

One day, the medical community will look back at the HIV causation hypothesis of AIDS as one of the biggest scientific blunders in recorded history. Instead of embracing Antoine Béchamp's Law of the Terrain, they gave us the Germ Theory on steroids by converting a harmless passenger virus named "HIV" into the personification of Dr. Evil.

One courageous man stood his ground on scientific principle and claimed that Robert Gallo was buck-naked. Just as was the case during the time of Pasteur and Béchamp, one had the favor of the emperor and the other was destined to be marginalized and fringed for daring to point out the inadequacies of the ruling elite.

Rather than being "elite," it turns out that the likes of Gallo and his HIV-worshipping followers are the effete descendants of those who attacked Ignaz Semmelweis for trying to improve the hygienic practices among the doctors of his day. Like Ron Paul, Peter Duesberg shines a powerful spotlight of integrity and truth on those who would stand in the way of liberty.

"In 1986, at age 49, he was elected to the National Academy of Sciences."

Do take the time to read the recent article on Professor Duesberg in Discover Magazine. In the end, whether you buy into the myth that HIV causes AIDS or not, you simply must respect a man who stands on pure scientific inquiry, rather than political expediency. If you were at the top of your profession and saw a truth that no one else in your peer group would acknowledge, would you blow the whistle knowing that you stand to lose everything?

If the founders of our country had not stood up for liberty in the face of English oppression, there would never had been a nation founded upon the principle of personal sovereignty. If it were not for scientists like Peter Duesberg, the earth might still be flat and at the center of the universe.

Although it is crumbling, the center of the HIV=AIDS paradigm is filled with big egos, big government and BIG PHARMA, not scientific integrity. Why is Peter Duesberg a perceived threat to the retroviral status quo? Because those that hold fast to the false religion of HIV-mediated immune deficiency know that their building does not meet scientific code.

You can hear Professor Duesberg live on the Robert Scott Bell Show during Hour Three. If you miss it, download the podcast after the show and listen at your leisure.

A Shot to the Head in Biological Darkness

Headline: Experts Agree: Vaccines Give Health Care A Needed Shot In The Arm "Disparities in access, inconsistent funding, public misperceptions, and scientific roadblocks, such as the disappointing results of HIV/AIDS vaccine trials, all stand in the way of more widespread use of immunizations."

Big Pharma wants us to perceive that all vaccines are safe and efficacious. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. From where do the public "misperceptions" come? They are largely the fault of the CDC and its need for immunological secrecy.

Over one billion dollars have been paid out to families of children who have been injured or killed by vaccination since the October 1, 1988 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (Public Law 99-660) put the the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) into play.

Misperception? Parents just want to know why government agencies are more interested in protecting pharmaceutical companies over their children. Of course, this is where parents have lost sight of their primary mission as protector of their own children. It is not the role of the federal government, nor medical authorities, to protect your children from biological ignorance. Just how bad a job must they do before we wake up and realize the callous disregard with which the federal government protects us? Just look at the FDA. Over 784,000 Americans meet their maker each year due to substances and methods which they approve in the medical realm.

It's not a stretch to say that FDA sucks pretty bad at accomplishing its stated mission. Harvey Wiley has rolled over in his grave so many times now that there's probably a sink hole all the way to Chinese heparin.

To which public misperception do the vaccine "experts" refer? Their great concern is that you might actually learn about the immunological truth of vaccination. It is based upon Louis Pasteur's victim consciousness-based biological paradigm. It is wholly incomplete and immature -- which is why you can't "fix" vaccines. They are built on a foundation of microbial quicksand. Even the most solid-looking building cannot be saved by changing the window treatments if it is built on a false foundation. This is what the thimerosal distraction amounts to -- changing the window dressing while the structure is falling down around you.

Yes, it's true that vaccination can limit the "expression" of a given disease, but the question of whether it is the best (or even a good) way of preventing it is never considered. Those with budgetary conflicts of interest running into the billions cannot conceive that childhood diseases may actually be nature's way of strengthening immune function for future generations. What are the long-term ramifications of preventing normal childhood immune development?

Name another culture in medical history that ever had a cancer rate of 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women.

"Living longer" does not explain a cancer epidemic in children, much less diabetes and neurological diseases in the young and younger. Each successive generation raised on vaccination instead of optimal nutrition suffers inevitably from a lack of true immunological understanding. In our pharmaceutical society, all biological symptoms have become indicative of a drug or vaccine deficiency, rather than a deficiency of knowing how to live correctly.

I reiterate, we have been convinced that the only way to live is by "pasteurizing" anything that is microscopic and moves. When will we put Pasteur out to pasture? Paging Antoine Béchamp.

Vaccination may be a shot in the arm to the pharmaceutical industry, but it is a shot in the head to the children sacrificed at the altar of the Church of Biological Mysticism. Sure, the road to autism is paved with good intentions, so what? Why do you think that more and more parents are reluctant to subject their children to mass vaccination?

Medical "experts" are even claiming that the failure to produce an "HIV" vaccine is a reason "shot" compliance rates are waning. In the case of the super-villain retrovirus, what they fail to acknowledge is that HIV has never been caught in the act of doing anything on the order of that which is later diagnosed as AIDS. This is another cognitively dissonant moment in vaccine worship.

How would they be able to tell the difference between an HIV antibody that is naturally derived (and used to mean certain death) and one that is vaccine-induced (and would, according to welfare scientists such as Robert Gallo) mean certain life? Perhaps we should all read up on the one man who has steadfastly remained scientific while the AIDS industry devolved into a primordial slime of political and pharmaceutical corruption. Antibodies in the era of AIDS conveniently mean opposite of what they used to indicate when there was some semblance of immunological sanity, prior to Big Pharma's purchase of Big Government.

It used to be considered blasphemous to question the third rail of medical politics. Now even formerly vociferous proponents of the vaccine religion are questioning its unquestionability.

It's just a shame that so many children were sacrificed along the way. Will yours be?