They Shoot Viruses Don't They? So What Has the Flu Shot to Do with Staph aureus? Hockey Pucks.

Headline: Jump seen in staph-linked flu deaths in kids "More children have died from flu because they also had staph infections, according to a new government report that urges parents to have their kids get the flu shot."

What does getting the flu shot have to do with preventing staph infections? Correlation is NOT causation. Despite what a caller to the show today said about random cross-reactivity, throwing a bunch of flu shot "mud" up against your biological wall is not an efficient (nor scientific) way to protect you from unknown strains of influenza virus.

Of course, now that government scientists claim that "a flu shot with the wrong strain of flu in it will enhance the speed and efficacy of the next flu shot with the wrong strain in it" I suppose it's reasonable to say that the flu shot prevents Staphylococcus aureus infections as well. I wonder if the Nobel Prize committee will issue an award for this absurdity too? This is the current (and sad) state of science on planet earth since it went welfare-sheik. Science is whatever the Ministry of Science says it is.

Did you ever feel like you were living inside of a George Orwell novel, circa a supposedly fictional 1984?

Pay no attention to the fact that there is no bacteria (or virus, for that matter) that can withstand the presence of oligodynamic silver hydrosol. Since dietary supplements are not part of the pharmacomafia-control of medicinals in America, they will never be endorsed by government. The question is: Are we intelligent enough to recognize that substances in nature can be more powerful in microgram doses than even gram doses of toxic, patented drugs "approved" by FDA?

Will you fall fall for the old "flu shot protects against staph" trick nonsense when the flu shot does not even reduce mortality in the primary risk groups for which it is given?

Maybe that's why Big PHARMA, Big Government and Big Media are repackaging flu vaccines for such off-label use. Because you are catching on, they have to move the influenza goalposts to keep you in line. Or, in the case of the "staph" analogy, they bring in a hockey net. What else can you expect from a bunch of CDC hockey pucks?

Alzheimer's Drug Deficiency Evidence of Researchers' Nutritional Deficiencies

Study Shows Alzheimer's Hits Earlier in Smokers, Drinkers "The best advice is probably to lighten up and have a drink a day -- but don't drink more than that," Denis Evans, a researcher at Rush University Medical Center says. In the entire article about this study, there was not even one mention of nutritional deficiencies. NOT ONE. Considering that the primary behaviors referenced in this Alzheimer's prediction study deplete the body of essential minerals, especially those that would protect against neurological degradation, I would have to say that it proves something that they did not intend.

It is proof positive that pharmaceutical research, no matter what the findings, must be reported in such a way as NOT to link true cause with the effect (disease), lest consumers realize that they do not suffer from a drug deficiency. What nutrient takes the big hit due to poor lifestyle choices such as smoking and drinking? Perhaps the most important one when it comes to preventing degradation diseases, including cancer and even Alzheimer's: Selenium.

Without selenium, how do you expect to deal with the cadmium from cigarette combustion? How do you expect that your liver can function at full capacity to detoxify from the self-inflicted auto-intoxication resulting from a destructive lifestyle? Do the medical experts at large (particularly those on the Taxpayer dole) recommend organic food, essential fats, mineral supplementation and proper hydration -- or are they still looking for a "miracle" vaccine or drug for brain degradation?

While I am on the subject of brain and neurological health, I would be remiss if I did not remind you about the importance of Silicon, found as Silica in food grown supplement form. Along with essential fats, silica may be the most important overlooked nutrient for neurological integrity.

You can go on believing that Alzheimer's is caused by cholesterol, but then you'll probably take a drug that would precipitate it. The only upside I can see is that at least you will not remember the mistake you made relying on the medical establishment for your health in the first place. It's still sad to consider such a reality, but that does not mean I will resort to SSRI medication. If you are still scared of the "C" word, try GTF Chromium to boost HDL cholesterol levels.

I suppose I took the red pill a long time ago.

I always did have trouble waiting for stupid people to give me permission to do things which I already know to be true. The thing is, their permission was never required, unless I had intended to wait for a pharmaceutical Godot which never comes, even if I had a prescription.

Don't wait for Alzheimer's or you will forget that it's already too late to rely upon pharmaceutical integrity. Or, go ahead and take the blue pill and you can go on believing in that which never existed. As for me, you can be sure I'll be taking my Silica, Selenium, GTF Chromium and essential fats...

CDC's Democratic Flu Shot Failure

CDC: Flu season worst in 3 years; vaccine didn't work well "Each year, health officials - making essentially an educated guess - formulate a vaccine against three viruses they think will be circulating." If anyone thought that I have been exaggerating about the technique to determine each year's flu shot, the mainstream media has once again proven me right, albeit 10 years later. Why can't dietary supplement manufacturers guess like that and get away with it? With each year that they goof, pharmaceutical companies are rewarded with more government contracts and the marketing support from the CDC. If these manufacturers and welfare scientists had to operate in the free market, they would have been fired immediately after the Swine Flu vaccine debacle of 1974. Actually, if they did not have the protection of government, they might have been imprisoned for assault with a deadly weapon. In addition to assault, we should charge them with fraud.

How is it that government can claim that EVERYONE needs a shot for which efficacy is not determined until after the flu season for which they inject you?

"They guess well most of the time, and the vaccine is often between 70 and 90 percent effective."

Are we supposed to be comforted by that made-up number? Attacks on dietary supplements and natural remedies are made largely because of conflicted claims that they may not be effective. Where are those same medical elitists when it comes to the lack of true scientific method involved in the annual influenza injection? Maybe we should ask them just how effective the mercury content is at producing deleterious intestinal and neurological events in children and old folks subjected to medical experimentation.

"Jernigan acknowledged that some people may lose faith in the flu vaccine and skip it next year. But he noted even this year, when the vaccine was not a good match, the vaccine still offered 44 percent protection overall."

Authorities claim less than 50% effectiveness this year and they are now worried that millions might skip the shot next year? I would say that would be a sane and rational decision for those willing to make it, even if it is a little late. When more people died of the Swine Flu vaccination than the Swine Flu in the 1970's, that should have been the death knell for annual injectable flu propaganda.

Not so with pharmaceutical fascism. Big PHARMA has the ability to buy government, so why wouldn't it? They did and they still do. It should be noted that only government could be used as a tool for something so stupid and potentially fatal. I repeat: a private business would have been bankrupted and its key personnel imprisoned for such a failure to produce safe and efficacious vaccines year after year. Five shots in a row and your risk of Alzheimer's shoots up exponentially? What about the CDC's annual claim of 36,000 dead to justify their promotion of worthless and dangerous vaccines?

"So far this year, 66 children died, including 46 who were not vaccinated. In 2003-2004, 153 children died."

You mean to tell me that even in a really bad year (2003-04), less that one-half of one percent of flu fatalities are children?!? The authorities just claimed that last flu season (2007-08) was "bad" resulting in 1/10 of 1% (.0012) of the total average influenza deaths among children. I have been pointing out that the CDC propaganda does not add up to reality, only a pharmaceutical phantasy. If we took the federal government at its word regarding flu danger, it would mean that approximately 99.9% percent of all flu-related deaths occurred in adult populations (including the elderly). Why inject children?

I call B.S. on the CDC and anyone who tries to defend them. Julie Gerberding can cry to Donna Shalala for all I care. It's about time to recognize just what federal agencies under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services really are -- tools for BIG PHARMA in control of BIG GOVERNMENT.

How many ways can you deal with influenza that are not approved by FDA? Let me count them. Actually, just do a search at rsbell.com for "flu" or "influenza" and you can count them. I've got more radio show prep to do.

Now that we have gotten that out of the way, isn't it time you purchased The Revolution: A Manifesto by Dr. Ron Paul? I've got my copy and it rocks. How? When you diagnose the underlying problem, only then can you apply the appropriate remedy. Just as the flu is not evidence of a flu shot deficiency -- what ails us is not a lack of government.

Of course, you still have the other option to turn your body over to the CDC each year and hope for the best. Please forgive me if I do not join you in exercising that option...